Suppr超能文献

颅面外科中钛、可生物降解的接骨板和螺钉以及氰基丙烯酸酯胶水固定系统的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery.

作者信息

Gosain A K, Song L, Corrao M A, Pintar F A

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Mar;101(3):582-91. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199803000-00004.

Abstract

Choice of appropriate fixation after reduction of displaced bone fragments or advancement of osteotomized segments requires knowledge of the maximal force to which these segments can be subjected. The present study was performed to obtain a biomechanical comparison of a variety of resorbable fixation systems as an alternative to metal plates and screws. Sheep cadaver parietal bone segments were osteotomized and fixed with one of six methods of fixation: (A) titanium plates and screws consisting of (1) miniplates and 2.0-mm-diameter screws; (2) midface plates and 1.5-mm screws; (3) microplates and 1.0-mm screws; (B) resorbable systems consisting of combinations of butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue and biodegradable polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer plates and 2.0-mm screws as follows: (1) direct glue fixation of segments; (2) resorbable plates fixed to bone segments with cyanoacrylate glue; (3) resorbable plates fixed with resorbable screws. Compression testing was performed upon bone segments advanced and fixed across a central gap, and distraction testing was performed on bone segments fixed in direct contact. Force to failure in both distraction and compression was significantly greater in bone segments fixed with titanium miniplates than with any other method of fixation. Segments fixed with plates and screws, either nonresorbable or resorbable, achieved stronger fixation in distraction than in compression for all plate sizes tested. Resorbable plate and screw fixation was as strong as standard titanium midface and microplating systems in distraction, and stronger than the latter techniques in compression. With compressive forces of relapse, fixation with glue and resorbable plates was as strong as standard titanium midface and microplating systems. However, with distractive forces of relapse, glue fixation of either the bone segments or resorbable plates was weaker than both titanium and resorbable alternatives in which plates and screws were used. These findings may have direct impact on the choice of fixation devices used to support osteotomized or fractured bone segments, which are subjected to persistent muscular and soft-tissue pull.

摘要

复位移位的骨碎片或推进截骨段后,选择合适的固定方式需要了解这些骨段所能承受的最大力。本研究旨在对多种可吸收固定系统进行生物力学比较,以替代金属板和螺钉。将绵羊尸体顶骨段进行截骨,并用六种固定方法之一进行固定:(A)钛板和螺钉,包括(1)微型板和直径2.0毫米的螺钉;(2)面中板和1.5毫米的螺钉;(3)微型板和1.0毫米的螺钉;(B)可吸收系统,由丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯胶与可生物降解的聚乳酸/聚乙醇酸共聚物板和2.0毫米螺钉组合而成,如下:(1)骨段直接用胶固定;(2)用氰基丙烯酸酯胶将可吸收板固定于骨段;(3)用可吸收螺钉固定可吸收板。对推进并跨越中央间隙固定的骨段进行压缩试验,对直接接触固定的骨段进行拉伸试验。用钛微型板固定的骨段在拉伸和压缩时的破坏力均显著大于其他任何固定方法。对于所有测试的板尺寸,用不可吸收或可吸收的板和螺钉固定的骨段在拉伸时的固定强度均高于压缩时。可吸收板和螺钉固定在拉伸时与标准钛面中板和微型板系统一样牢固,在压缩时比后两种技术更牢固。在复发的压缩力作用下,用胶和可吸收板固定与标准钛面中板和微型板系统一样牢固。然而,在复发的牵张力作用下,骨段或可吸收板的胶固定比使用板和螺钉的钛和可吸收替代方法都弱。这些发现可能对用于支撑截骨或骨折骨段的固定装置的选择有直接影响,这些骨段会受到持续的肌肉和软组织牵拉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验