Suppr超能文献

测量英国社区职业疗法治疗痴呆症干预措施的实施保真度。

Measuring fidelity of delivery of the Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-UK intervention.

机构信息

Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1385-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interpreting data about intervention effectiveness requires an understanding of which intervention components were delivered and whether they were delivered as planned (fidelity of delivery). These studies aimed to develop a reliable measure for assessing fidelity of delivery of the Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-UK intervention (COTiD-UK) (Study 1) and measure fidelity of delivery of COTiD-UK across sessions, sites and occupational therapists (Study 2).

METHODS

The studies used a longitudinal observational design nested within a multi-site randomised controlled trial. Where practicable, all intervention sessions were audio-recorded. Fidelity checklists and coding guidelines were developed, piloted and refined until good agreement was achieved between two coders. Ten percent of sessions were purposively sampled from 12 sites and 31 occupational therapists. Transcripts were coded using checklists developed in Study 1; 10% of sets of intervention session transcripts were double coded to ensure that agreement was maintained. Percentages of components that were delivered were calculated for each session, site and occupational therapist.

RESULTS

A reliable measure of fidelity of delivery for COTiD-UK was developed after several rounds of piloting and amendments. COTiD-UK was delivered with moderate fidelity across all six sessions (range: 52.4-75.5%). The mean range of fidelity varied across sites (26.7-91.2%) and occupational therapists (26.7-94.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable, systematic method for measuring fidelity of delivery of COTiD-UK was developed and applied, and can be adapted for use in similar interventions. As COTiD-UK was delivered with moderate fidelity, there is a reasonable degree of confidence that intervention effects were attributable to COTiD-UK.

摘要

背景

解释干预效果的数据需要了解干预的哪些组成部分得到了实施,以及它们是否按照计划实施(实施的保真度)。这些研究旨在开发一种可靠的措施,以评估社区职业治疗在痴呆症中的英国干预措施(COTiD-UK)(研究 1)的实施保真度,并衡量 COTiD-UK 在各个会议、地点和职业治疗师中的实施保真度(研究 2)。

方法

这些研究使用了纵向观察设计,嵌套在一个多地点随机对照试验中。在可行的情况下,所有干预会议都进行了录音。制定了实施保真度检查表和编码准则,并进行了试点和改进,直到两位编码员之间达成良好的一致性。从 12 个地点和 31 名职业治疗师中,有针对性地抽取了 10%的会议进行抽样。使用在研究 1 中开发的检查表对记录进行编码;10%的干预会议记录集进行了双编码,以确保一致性得以维持。为每个会议、地点和职业治疗师计算了实施的组件的百分比。

结果

经过几轮试点和修订,开发了一种可靠的 COTiD-UK 实施保真度测量方法。在所有六个会议中,COTiD-UK 的实施保真度适中(范围:52.4-75.5%)。各个地点(26.7-91.2%)和职业治疗师(26.7-94.1%)的保真度平均值范围各不相同。

结论

开发并应用了一种可靠的、系统的 COTiD-UK 实施保真度测量方法,并且可以适用于类似的干预措施。由于 COTiD-UK 的实施保真度适中,因此有相当程度的信心认为干预效果归因于 COTiD-UK。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c66/6929510/feece7a564f4/12877_2019_1385_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验