Suppr超能文献

[两款便携式电子肺活量计可靠性评估]

[Evaluation of the reliability of 2 portable electronic spirometers].

作者信息

Tschopp J M, Roulin J P, Juilland A, Erné R

机构信息

Centre valaisan de pneumologie, Montana.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1988 Sep 24;118(38):1382-5.

PMID:3187474
Abstract

Two portable electronic spirometers, Vitalograph Compact (C) and Vitalograph Alpha (A), were evaluated for measurement of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), slow vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) compared with a high quality Gould 2400 spirometer (G). Ten normal subjects and 10 patients with obstructive lung disease performed spirometry at the same time of day and in randomized order. The results showed a close agreement between G and C or A for FEV1 (r = 0.99 and 0.97 respectively); for VC (r = 0.99 and 0.98 respectively); for FVC (r = 0.99 and 0.97 respectively), and for PEF (r = 0.95 and 0.93 respectively). The results show that these 2 portable spirometers are highly accurate for the parameters measured.

摘要

对两款便携式电子肺活量计,即伟康简易型(C)和伟康阿尔法型(A),进行了评估,以测量第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、慢肺活量(VC)、用力肺活量(FVC)和呼气峰值流速(PEF),并与一台高质量的古尔德2400型肺活量计(G)进行比较。10名正常受试者和10名阻塞性肺疾病患者在一天中的同一时间,以随机顺序进行肺活量测定。结果显示,对于FEV1,G与C或A之间具有高度一致性(r分别为0.99和0.97);对于VC(r分别为0.99和0.98);对于FVC(r分别为0.99和0.97),以及对于PEF(r分别为0.95和0.93)。结果表明,这两款便携式肺活量计在所测量参数方面具有高度准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验