• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学哲学系列:通过探索范式、本体论、认识论、价值论和方法论,利用多学科边缘效应。

Philosophy of Science Series: Harnessing the Multidisciplinary Edge Effect by Exploring Paradigms, Ontologies, Epistemologies, Axiologies, and Methodologies.

机构信息

L. Varpio is professor and associate director of research, Graduate Programs in Health Professions Education, Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-4341. A. MacLeod is professor of continuing professional development and medical education, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):686-689. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142
PMID:31876567
Abstract

Health professions education (HPE) researchers come from many different academic traditions, from psychology to engineering to rhetoric. Trained in these traditions, HPE researchers engage in science and the building of new knowledge from different paradigmatic orientations. Collaborating across these traditions is particularly generative, a phenomenon the authors call the multidisciplinary edge effect. However, to harness this productivity, scholars need to understand their own paradigms and those of others so that collaboration can flourish. This Invited Commentary introduces the Philosophy of Science series-a collection of articles that introduce readers to 7 different paradigms that are frequently used in HPE research or that the authors suggest will be increasingly common in future studies. Each article in the collection presents a concise and accessible description of the main principles of a paradigm so that researchers can quickly grasp how these traditions differ from each other. In this introductory article, the authors define and illustrate key terms that are essential to understanding these traditions (i.e., paradigm, ontology, epistemology, methodology, and axiology) and explain the structure that each article in this series follows.

摘要

健康职业教育(HPE)研究人员来自许多不同的学术传统,包括心理学、工程学和修辞学。HPE 研究人员接受这些传统的培训,从不同的范式取向从事科学和新知识的构建。跨这些传统进行合作特别具有创造性,作者称之为多学科边缘效应。然而,要利用这种生产力,学者们需要了解自己的范式和他人的范式,以便合作能够蓬勃发展。本特邀评论介绍了科学哲学系列——一组文章,向读者介绍了在 HPE 研究中经常使用的 7 种范式,或者作者认为在未来的研究中会越来越常见的范式。该系列中的每一篇文章都对一个范式的主要原则进行了简洁易懂的描述,以便研究人员能够快速掌握这些传统之间的差异。在这篇介绍性文章中,作者定义并说明了理解这些传统的关键术语(即范式、本体论、认识论、方法论和价值论),并解释了本系列中每篇文章遵循的结构。

相似文献

1
Philosophy of Science Series: Harnessing the Multidisciplinary Edge Effect by Exploring Paradigms, Ontologies, Epistemologies, Axiologies, and Methodologies.科学哲学系列:通过探索范式、本体论、认识论、价值论和方法论,利用多学科边缘效应。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):686-689. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142.
2
Being Edgy in Health Professions Education: Concluding the Philosophy of Science Series.医学专业教育中的前卫性:科学哲学系列的结论。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):995-998. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003250.
3
Five Principles for Using Educational Theory: Strategies for Advancing Health Professions Education Research.运用教育理论的五项原则:推进健康专业教育研究的策略。
Acad Med. 2020 Apr;95(4):518-522. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003066.
4
Postpositivism in Health Professions Education Scholarship.健康职业教育学术中的后实证主义。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):695-699. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003089.
5
Commentary: Paradigms, Axiology, and Praxeology in Medical Education Research.评论:医学教育研究中的范式、价值观和实践论。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S1-S7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002384.
6
Phenomenological Research in Health Professions Education: Tunneling from Both Ends.健康职业教育中的现象学研究:从两端掘进。
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):113-121. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1971989. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education.关于客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)体验的现象学研究方法、方法学挑战及经验教训:医学教育中范式驱动的定性方法概述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Nov 23;49:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
A dialogue about two nursing science traditions: the Roy adaptation model and the human becoming theory.关于两种护理科学传统的对话:罗伊适应模式与人类成长理论。
Nurs Sci Q. 2004 Oct;17(4):301-7. doi: 10.1177/0894318404269366.
9
Introduction to the special issue on critical realism.专刊介绍:批判现实主义
J Community Psychol. 2025 Jan;53(1):e22981. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22981. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Critical Theory: Broadening Our Thinking to Explore the Structural Factors at Play in Health Professions Education.批判理论:拓宽思维,探索健康职业教育中发挥作用的结构性因素。
Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):842-845. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003108.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of mentorship in Graduate Medical Education: a proposed conceptual framework.研究生医学教育中导师指导的范围综述:一个拟议的概念框架
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1616148. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1616148. eCollection 2025.
2
Is a Hot Dog a Sandwich? Using Lateral Thinking to Teach Philosophy of Science.热狗是三明治吗?运用横向思维讲授科学哲学。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Aug;17(4):420-422. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00929.1. Epub 2025 Aug 15.
3
Expanding worldviews on psychometric analysis of measurement tools in health professions education and research.
拓展对健康职业教育与研究中测量工具的心理测量分析的世界观。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Aug;18(8):838-851. doi: 10.1002/ase.70053. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
4
Foundational Aspects of Neurology Education Research: Philosophy of Science as the Starting Point of Neurology Education Research.神经病学教育研究的基础方面:以科学哲学作为神经病学教育研究的起点
Neurol Educ. 2024 Dec 30;4(1):e200177. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200177. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
When I say … neurodiversity paradigm.当我说……神经多样性范式。
Med Educ. 2025 May;59(5):466-468. doi: 10.1111/medu.15565. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
6
Legitimation Without Argumentation: An Empirical Discourse Analysis of 'Validity as an Argument' in Assessment.无需论证的合法化:评估中“有效性即论证”的实证话语分析。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 3;13(1):469-480. doi: 10.5334/pme.1404. eCollection 2024.
7
Professional Experiences and Career Trajectories of Mid- to Senior-Career Women Clinician-Scientists: A Qualitative Study.中老年女性临床科学家的专业经历和职业轨迹:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246040. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6040.
8
A Conference (Missingness in Action) to Address Missingness in Data and AI in Health Care: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.会议(行动中的缺失)旨在解决医疗保健数据和人工智能中的缺失问题:定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e49314. doi: 10.2196/49314.
9
"Tell me what is 'better'!" How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning.“告诉我什么是‘更好’!”——从自我调节学习的角度看医学生如何体验反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9.
10
Teaching LGBTQ+ Health, a Web-Based Faculty Development Course: Program Evaluation Study Using the RE-AIM Framework.《基于网络的教师发展课程:使用 RE-AIM 框架的项目评估研究——教授 LGBTQ+ 健康》
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 21;9:e47777. doi: 10.2196/47777.