State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests / Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Crop, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Control of Forest Diseases and Pests, College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0226818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226818. eCollection 2019.
For molecular research, the quality and integrity of DNA obtained will affect the reliability of subsequent results. Extracting quality DNA from scale insects, including mealybugs, can be difficult due to their small body size and waxy coating. In this study, we evaluate eight commonly used DNA extraction methods to determine their efficacy in PCR analysis across life stages and preservation times. We find that fresh samples, immediately upon collection or after 2 wks, resulted in the most effective DNA extraction. Methods using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit, NaCl, SDS-RNase A, and SDS isolated DNA of sufficient quality DNA. The SDS method gave high DNA yield, while the NaCl and SDS-RNase A methods gave lower yield. NaCl, SDS-RNase A, SDS, chloroform-isopentyl alcohol, and the salting-out methods all resulted in sufficient DNA for PCR, and performed equal to or better than that of the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit. When time and cost per extraction were considered, the SDS method was most efficient, especially for later life stages of mealybug, regardless of preservation duration. DNA extracted from a single fresh sample of a female adult mealybug was adequate for more than 10,000 PCR reactions. For earlier stages, including the egg and 1st instar nymph samples, DNA was most effectively extracted by the Rapid method. Our results provide guidelines for the choice of effective DNA extraction method for mealybug or other small insects across different life stages and preservation status.
对于分子研究,获得的 DNA 的质量和完整性将影响后续结果的可靠性。从介壳虫(包括粉蚧)中提取高质量的 DNA 可能很困难,因为它们的体型小且有蜡质涂层。在这项研究中,我们评估了 8 种常用的 DNA 提取方法,以确定它们在不同生命阶段和保存时间的 PCR 分析中的效果。我们发现,新鲜样本(刚采集或采集后 2 周内)的 DNA 提取效果最佳。使用 DNeasy Blood & Tissue 试剂盒、NaCl、SDS-RNase A 和 SDS 的方法可以分离出足够质量的 DNA。SDS 方法的 DNA 产量较高,而 NaCl 和 SDS-RNase A 方法的产量较低。NaCl、SDS-RNase A、SDS、氯仿-异戊醇和盐析法都能获得足够用于 PCR 的 DNA,其效果与 DNeasy Blood & Tissue 试剂盒相当或更好。当考虑每次提取的时间和成本时,SDS 法最有效,尤其是对于粉蚧的后期生命阶段,无论保存时间长短如何。从单个新鲜雌性成虫粉蚧样本中提取的 DNA 足以进行超过 10000 次 PCR 反应。对于早期阶段,包括卵和 1 龄若虫样本,快速法最有效地提取 DNA。我们的研究结果为在不同生命阶段和保存状态下,针对粉蚧或其他小型昆虫,选择有效的 DNA 提取方法提供了指导。