Stanton B F, Clemens J D, Khair T
International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Nov;48(5):1166-72. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.5.1166.
We evaluated whether an educational intervention that was effective in reducing childhood diarrhea also improved childhood nutritional status. Fifty-one communities of 38 families each were randomized to receive the intervention or no intervention. During 1 y of follow-up the rate of diarrhea (per 100 wk) in children less than 6 y in the intervention group was 5.89 episodes whereas that in the nonintervention group was 7.55 episodes (protective efficacy 22%; p less than 0.0001). During the same follow-up period children in both groups exhibited comparable patterns of weight gain; 1 y after the intervention the mean weight for age of children in both groups was 76% of the NCHS standard. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of each group that experienced a major deterioration or improvement of nutritional status. We conclude that an intervention that reduces rates of childhood diarrhea may not necessarily also improve nutritional status.
我们评估了一项在减少儿童腹泻方面有效的教育干预措施是否也能改善儿童营养状况。将51个社区(每个社区有38个家庭)随机分为接受干预组或不接受干预组。在1年的随访期间,干预组6岁以下儿童的腹泻率(每100周)为5.89次,而无干预组为7.55次(保护效力22%;p<0.0001)。在同一随访期内,两组儿童的体重增加模式相当;干预1年后,两组儿童的年龄别平均体重均为美国国家卫生统计中心标准的76%。在营养状况出现重大恶化或改善的每组比例中未观察到显著差异。我们得出结论,一项降低儿童腹泻率的干预措施不一定也能改善营养状况。