文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

FOODLIT-PRO:食品素养领域、影响因素和决定因素——一项定性研究。

FOODLIT-PRO: Food Literacy Domains, Influential Factors and Determinants-A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

WJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.

Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Dec 27;12(1):88. doi: 10.3390/nu12010088.


DOI:10.3390/nu12010088
PMID:31892245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7019603/
Abstract

Poor eating habits are increasing the prevalence of weight-related issues, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Given the demand to improve individuals' food knowledge and competencies aiming at healthier behaviours, the current investigation explores the concept of food literacy. Considering the lack of a shared understanding of food literacy, this study aims to explore food literacy's domains, influential factors and determinants. Using a qualitative deductive-dominant content analysis, 30 experts from food-related fields were interviewed. The obtained outcomes were compared to available food literacy frameworks. Agreement among inter-raters was nearly perfect (k = 0.82). Yielding a total of 184 codes nested within 19 categories, identified domains were Origin, Safety, Choice and Decision, Select and Acquire, Plan, Preserve, Prepare, Cook, and Knowledge; influential factors included Nutrition, Psychological, Health, Learning Contexts, Policy, Industry, Sustainability, and Social and Cultural; External determinants were "Access to Food-Related Information", "Perishable and/or Unreliable Food-Related Information", "Family Dynamic and/or Identity", and "Professionals' Unpreparedness on Food-Related Expertise", and Internal determinants included "Prioritise Food", "Convenience and Practicality", "Time and Financial Management", "Previous Food-Related Habits", and "Innate and Learned Flavour Preferences". In conclusion, more than half of the identified attributes (62.5%) are corroborated by the current literature. However, the manifested content unmatched with the current frameworks of food literacy literature express food-literacy-related fields of action, knowledge, competencies, and determinants that have not yet been explored. As such, this study provides new and useful information concerning food literacy definition and development, by identifying its domains, factors of influence, and potential determinants. Moreover, this work paves the way for new measurements and interventions within this field.

摘要

不良饮食习惯导致与体重相关的问题(如糖尿病和心血管疾病)日益普遍。鉴于需要提高个人的食物知识和能力以实现更健康的行为,当前研究探索了食物素养的概念。考虑到对食物素养缺乏共识,本研究旨在探索食物素养的领域、影响因素和决定因素。本研究采用定性演绎主导内容分析法,对来自食品相关领域的 30 名专家进行了访谈。将获得的结果与现有的食物素养框架进行了比较。评分者之间的一致性几乎是完美的(k = 0.82)。产生了嵌套在 19 个类别中的总共 184 个代码,确定的领域包括来源、安全、选择和决策、选择和获取、计划、保存、准备、烹饪和知识;影响因素包括营养、心理、健康、学习环境、政策、产业、可持续性和社会文化;外部决定因素是“获取与食物相关的信息”、“易腐烂和/或不可靠的食物相关信息”、“家庭动态和/或身份”以及“专业人员对食物相关专业知识的准备不足”,内部决定因素包括“优先考虑食物”、“方便和实用性”、“时间和财务管理”、“以前的食物相关习惯”和“先天和后天的口味偏好”。总之,识别出的属性中有一半以上(62.5%)得到了现有文献的证实。然而,所表现出的内容与现有的食物素养文献框架不匹配,表明与食物素养相关的行动领域、知识、能力和尚未探索的决定因素。因此,本研究通过确定其领域、影响因素和潜在决定因素,为食物素养的定义和发展提供了新的有用信息。此外,这项工作为该领域的新测量和干预措施铺平了道路。

相似文献

[1]
FOODLIT-PRO: Food Literacy Domains, Influential Factors and Determinants-A Qualitative Study.

Nutrients. 2019-12-27

[2]
FOODLIT-PRO: conceptual and empirical development of the food literacy wheel.

Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2021-2

[3]
FOODLIT-tool: Development and validation of the adaptable food literacy tool towards global sustainability within food systems.

Appetite. 2022-1-1

[4]
A new interministerial strategy for the promotion of healthy eating in Portugal: implementation and initial results.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2018-10-30

[5]
Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy.

Health Promot Int. 2018-6-1

[6]
Food Literacy: Definition and Framework for Action.

Can J Diet Pract Res. 2015-9

[7]
The Nuances of Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy.

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015

[8]
Defining food literacy: A scoping review.

Appetite. 2017-5-6

[9]
A Qualitative Study of the Development of Health Literacy Capacities of Participants Attending a Community-Based Cardiovascular Health Programme.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018-6-2

[10]
"We know what we should be eating, but we don't always do that." How and why people eat the way they do: a qualitative study with rural australians.

BMC Public Health. 2024-5-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Social Determinants of Food Literacy in Iranian Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Food Sci Nutr. 2025-3-7

[2]
Adaptation of the Food Literacy (FOODLIT) Tool for Turkish Adults: A Validity and Reliability Study.

Nutrients. 2024-10-9

[3]
Who has a high level of food literacy, and who does not?: a qualitative study of college students in South Korea.

Nutr Res Pract. 2023-12

[4]
Exploring the Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Literacy on Adherence to Dietary Recommendations and Food Literacy.

Nutrients. 2023-6-23

[5]
11- to 13-Year-Old Children's Rejection and Acceptance of Unfamiliar Food: The Role of Food Play and Animalness.

Nutrients. 2023-3-8

[6]
The Household Food Security and Feeding Pattern of Preschool Children in North-Central Nigeria.

Nutrients. 2022-10-3

[7]
The Relationships between Food Literacy, Health Promotion Literacy and Healthy Eating Habits among Young Adults in South Korea.

Foods. 2022-8-16

[8]
FOODLIT-Trial: Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Digital Intervention to Promote Food Literacy and Sustainability Behaviours in Adults Using the Health Action Process Approach and the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-3-16

[9]
Food Literacy and Its Associated Factors in Non-Dialysis Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022-2-18

[10]
Are We Closer to International Consensus on the Term 'Food Literacy'? A Systematic Scoping Review of Its Use in the Academic Literature (1998-2019).

Nutrients. 2021-6-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Promoting children's health: Toward a consensus statement on food literacy.

Can J Public Health. 2017-3

[2]
A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults.

Nutrients. 2019-4-8

[3]
The need for a food-systems approach to policy making.

Lancet. 2019-3-16

[4]
Complexities in Conceptualizing and Measuring Food Literacy.

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019-4

[5]
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.

Lancet. 2019-2-2

[6]
Neighbourhood social capital and obesity: a systematic review of the literature.

Obes Rev. 2018-10-10

[7]
Barriers to Food Literacy: A Conceptual Model to Explore Factors Inhibiting Proficiency.

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019-1

[8]
Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: the development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018-6-18

[9]
Food additives, food and the concept of 'food addiction': Is stimulation of the brain reward circuit by food sufficient to trigger addiction?

Pathophysiology. 2018-12

[10]
What's technology cooking up? A systematic review of the use of technology in adolescent food literacy programs.

Appetite. 2018-2-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索