WJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 27;12(1):88. doi: 10.3390/nu12010088.
Poor eating habits are increasing the prevalence of weight-related issues, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Given the demand to improve individuals' food knowledge and competencies aiming at healthier behaviours, the current investigation explores the concept of food literacy. Considering the lack of a shared understanding of food literacy, this study aims to explore food literacy's domains, influential factors and determinants. Using a qualitative deductive-dominant content analysis, 30 experts from food-related fields were interviewed. The obtained outcomes were compared to available food literacy frameworks. Agreement among inter-raters was nearly perfect (k = 0.82). Yielding a total of 184 codes nested within 19 categories, identified domains were Origin, Safety, Choice and Decision, Select and Acquire, Plan, Preserve, Prepare, Cook, and Knowledge; influential factors included Nutrition, Psychological, Health, Learning Contexts, Policy, Industry, Sustainability, and Social and Cultural; External determinants were "Access to Food-Related Information", "Perishable and/or Unreliable Food-Related Information", "Family Dynamic and/or Identity", and "Professionals' Unpreparedness on Food-Related Expertise", and Internal determinants included "Prioritise Food", "Convenience and Practicality", "Time and Financial Management", "Previous Food-Related Habits", and "Innate and Learned Flavour Preferences". In conclusion, more than half of the identified attributes (62.5%) are corroborated by the current literature. However, the manifested content unmatched with the current frameworks of food literacy literature express food-literacy-related fields of action, knowledge, competencies, and determinants that have not yet been explored. As such, this study provides new and useful information concerning food literacy definition and development, by identifying its domains, factors of influence, and potential determinants. Moreover, this work paves the way for new measurements and interventions within this field.
不良饮食习惯导致与体重相关的问题(如糖尿病和心血管疾病)日益普遍。鉴于需要提高个人的食物知识和能力以实现更健康的行为,当前研究探索了食物素养的概念。考虑到对食物素养缺乏共识,本研究旨在探索食物素养的领域、影响因素和决定因素。本研究采用定性演绎主导内容分析法,对来自食品相关领域的 30 名专家进行了访谈。将获得的结果与现有的食物素养框架进行了比较。评分者之间的一致性几乎是完美的(k = 0.82)。产生了嵌套在 19 个类别中的总共 184 个代码,确定的领域包括来源、安全、选择和决策、选择和获取、计划、保存、准备、烹饪和知识;影响因素包括营养、心理、健康、学习环境、政策、产业、可持续性和社会文化;外部决定因素是“获取与食物相关的信息”、“易腐烂和/或不可靠的食物相关信息”、“家庭动态和/或身份”以及“专业人员对食物相关专业知识的准备不足”,内部决定因素包括“优先考虑食物”、“方便和实用性”、“时间和财务管理”、“以前的食物相关习惯”和“先天和后天的口味偏好”。总之,识别出的属性中有一半以上(62.5%)得到了现有文献的证实。然而,所表现出的内容与现有的食物素养文献框架不匹配,表明与食物素养相关的行动领域、知识、能力和尚未探索的决定因素。因此,本研究通过确定其领域、影响因素和潜在决定因素,为食物素养的定义和发展提供了新的有用信息。此外,这项工作为该领域的新测量和干预措施铺平了道路。
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2021-2
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018-10-30
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2015-9
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015
Appetite. 2017-5-6
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018-6-2
Food Sci Nutr. 2025-3-7
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022-2-18
Can J Public Health. 2017-3
Lancet. 2019-3-16
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019-4
Obes Rev. 2018-10-10
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019-1