Carlsson Hanna, Sandholm Kerstin, Haddish Haben Woldu, Brudin Lars, Ekdahl Kristina Nilsson, Tjernberg Ivar
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Centre of Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 May;39(5):855-862. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03807-5. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and infection may lead to not only a large variety of clinical manifestations but also a subclinical outcome. The aim of the present study was to investigate if there is a constitutional difference in complement activation between individuals with previous subclinical Lyme borreliosis (SB) and patients previously diagnosed with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).Lepirudin plasma for activation studies was collected from 60 SB individuals and from 22 patients pre-diagnosed with LNB. The plasma was incubated with live Borrelia spirochetes of two strains (complement sensitive B. garinii Lu59 and complement resistant B. afzelii ACA1).Complement factor C3 was measured in non-activated lepirudin plasma with immune-nephelometry and C3a and sC5b-9 generated during complement activation were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.We found that the complement sensitive Lu59 induced higher complement activation than the complement resistant ACA1 when measuring activation products C3a and sC5b-9 in SB and LNB patients, p < 0.0001. No significant difference was found between SB and LNB patients in systemic levels of C3. Furthermore, SB individuals generated a higher activation of C3 cleavage to C3a (C3a/C3 ratio) than LNB patients after activation with ACA1, p < 0.001, but no significant differences were found in response to Lu59. In conclusion, Lu59 induced higher complement activation than ACA1 and individuals with previous SB showed increased generation of C3a compared with patients with previous LNB. In our study population, this mechanism could lead to less elimination of spirochetes in LNB patients and thereby be a factor contributing to the clinical outcome.
莱姆病(LB)由伯氏疏螺旋体引起,感染不仅可能导致多种临床表现,还可能导致亚临床结局。本研究的目的是调查既往有亚临床莱姆病(SB)的个体与既往诊断为莱姆神经疏螺旋体病(LNB)的患者在补体激活方面是否存在体质差异。从60名SB个体和22名预先诊断为LNB的患者中采集用于激活研究的水蛭素血浆。将血浆与两种菌株的活伯氏疏螺旋体(补体敏感的伽氏疏螺旋体Lu59和补体抗性的阿氏疏螺旋体ACA1)一起孵育。用免疫比浊法在未激活的水蛭素血浆中测量补体因子C3,并用酶联免疫吸附测定法测量补体激活过程中产生的C3a和sC5b-9。我们发现,在测量SB和LNB患者的激活产物C3a和sC5b-9时,补体敏感的Lu59比补体抗性的ACA1诱导更高的补体激活,p<0.0001。SB和LNB患者的C3全身水平未发现显著差异。此外,在用ACA1激活后,SB个体产生的C3裂解为C3a的激活程度(C3a/C3比值)高于LNB患者,p<0.001,但对Lu59的反应未发现显著差异。总之,Lu59比ACA1诱导更高的补体激活,与既往有LNB的患者相比,既往有SB的个体显示出更高的C3a生成。在我们的研究人群中,这种机制可能导致LNB患者中螺旋体的清除减少,从而成为影响临床结局的一个因素。