University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Opole Medical School, Opole, Poland.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Nov;32(11):2233-2240. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01439-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Frailty syndrome (FS) is one of the biggest problems faced by an ageing population.
The aim of the study was to analyse selected parameters to assess the possibility of FS or symptoms related to this syndrome among independent and subjectively healthy people aged 60 + years and to select tests that may have a high level of diagnostic success while at the same time being easy to conduct, standardised and have a high level of reliability.
The study group consisted of 1006 people aged 60 + years and the research protocol was very extensive, focusing on the broadly understood assessment of the functional biological markers of health in this group of people. The main outcome measures were hand-grip strength, 8-foot up-and-go test, and weekly physical activity (PA).
In considering the three basic pre-frail criteria, we observed significant reductions in muscle strength, walking speed, and weekly PA in a healthy and independent-living population. The results of the analysis of variance and detailed comparisons with the LSD test confirmed intergroup disparities. In terms of somatic features, statistically significant differences occurred in groups based on age and sex in favour of men and younger people. However, the division into non-frail and pre-frail groups with reference to the risk of frailty syndrome showed no differentiation between groups in somatic features.
There is a risk of frailty syndrome in a healthy and independent-living (non-community-dwelling) population of people aged 60 + years. The higher the age, the greater the risk is, with females being more vulnerable to FS than males. Furthermore, it should be noted that healthy and independent-living seniors may prefer dwelling in the community but are also at risk of FS. The hand-grip and 8-foot up-and-go tests may be good for diagnosing FS in all ageing populations from many different backgrounds.
The hand-grip evaluation, as well as a test that assesses motion speed and dynamic balance, may be among the best methods to measure the risk of frailty syndrome in ageing populations of healthy and independent-living seniors. The lower the values on these tests were, the higher the risk of FS. The advantage of these tests may lie in their ease of implementation and lack of need for expensive clinical equipment to take measurements, as well as the possibility for a high level of standardisation and reliability.
衰弱综合征(FS)是人口老龄化面临的最大问题之一。
本研究旨在分析评估 60 岁及以上独立且主观健康人群 FS 或与该综合征相关症状的可能性的选择参数,并选择可能具有高诊断成功率同时易于进行、标准化且具有高可靠性的测试。
研究组由 1006 名 60 岁及以上的人组成,研究方案非常广泛,重点评估该人群的健康功能生物标志物。主要的观察指标是手握力、8 英尺起立行走测试和每周体力活动(PA)。
考虑到三个基本的衰弱前标准,我们观察到健康且独立生活的人群中肌肉力量、行走速度和每周 PA 显著降低。方差分析的结果和与 LSD 检验的详细比较证实了组间差异。就躯体特征而言,基于年龄和性别,男女之间存在统计学显著差异,年轻人更占优势。然而,根据衰弱综合征的风险将身体特征分为非衰弱和衰弱前组,并没有在组间进行区分。
在 60 岁及以上健康且独立生活(非社区居住)人群中存在衰弱综合征的风险。年龄越大,风险越高,女性比男性更容易发生 FS。此外,值得注意的是,健康且独立生活的老年人可能更喜欢居住在社区,但也存在发生 FS 的风险。手握力和 8 英尺起立行走测试可能是评估所有不同背景的老龄化人群发生 FS 的良好方法。
手握力评估以及评估运动速度和动态平衡的测试可能是评估健康和独立生活的老年人群衰弱综合征风险的最佳方法之一。这些测试的数值越低,FS 的风险越高。这些测试的优势在于它们易于实施,不需要昂贵的临床设备进行测量,并且具有高度的标准化和可靠性。