Suppr
超能文献

膳食成分数据库评估蛋白质、钠和钾摄入量的有效性与 24 小时尿排泄量的比较：与标准食物成分数据库的比较。

Validity of a dish composition database for estimating protein, sodium and potassium intakes against 24 h urinary excretion: comparison with a standard food composition database.

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jun;23(8):1297-1306. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003550. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980019003550

PMID:31896376

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10200430/

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the validity of a recently developed dish composition database (DCD) against urinary biomarkers compared with a standard food composition database (FCD).

DESIGN

Intakes of protein, Na and K were estimated by 2 × 24 h urine collections and by 4 d dietary record data based on the DCD (including 128 dishes) or FCD (including 1878 foods).

SETTING

Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 161 men and 163 women aged 20-69 years.

RESULTS

Compared with the 24 h urine-based estimates, the median intakes estimated using the DCD and FCD differed significantly for protein and Na in men and for Na and K in women. Deattenuated Spearman correlation coefficients using 24 h urine-based estimates for the intakes of protein, Na and K were lower in the DCD (respectively: 0·26, 0·15 and 0·44 in men; 0·22, 0·27 and 0·22 in women) than those in the FCD (respectively: 0·43, 0·40 and 0·59 in men; 0·33, 0·45 and 0·42 in women). When data on dish portion size reported by participants were used for estimation instead of standard portion-size data based on the DCD, the accuracy of the estimated median intakes did not change notably, whereas the deattenuated correlation coefficients improved (for protein, Na and K respectively: 0·32, 0·31 and 0·56 in men; 0·31, 0·41 and 0·39 in women).

CONCLUSIONS

The DCD supported by individual-level information on dish portion size showed fair to moderate validity in ranking individuals according to their intakes of protein, Na and K, similar to the FCD.

摘要

目的

我们评估了一个最近开发的餐盘成分数据库（DCD）与标准食物成分数据库（FCD）相比，其用于评估尿液生物标志物的有效性。

设计

通过 2×24 小时尿液收集和基于 DCD（包括 128 道菜）或 FCD（包括 1878 种食物）的 4 天饮食记录数据，估计蛋白质、Na 和 K 的摄入量。

设置

日本。

参与者

共有 161 名男性和 163 名年龄在 20-69 岁的女性。

结果

与 24 小时尿液估计值相比，DCD 和 FCD 估计的蛋白质和 Na 摄入量在男性中存在显著差异，而在女性中则是 Na 和 K 的摄入量存在显著差异。使用 24 小时尿液估计值对蛋白质、Na 和 K 摄入量进行去关联 Spearman 相关系数，DCD 中的相关系数（男性分别为 0.26、0.15 和 0.44；女性分别为 0.22、0.27 和 0.22）低于 FCD（男性分别为 0.43、0.40 和 0.59；女性分别为 0.33、0.45 和 0.42）。当使用参与者报告的餐盘份量数据进行估计，而不是基于 DCD 的标准份量数据时，估计中位数摄入量的准确性没有显著变化，而去关联相关系数有所改善（对于蛋白质、Na 和 K，男性分别为 0.32、0.31 和 0.56；女性分别为 0.31、0.41 和 0.39）。