Gismervik Sigmund Ø, Aasdahl Lene, Vasseljen Ottar, Fors Egil A, Rise Marit B, Johnsen Roar, Hara Karen, Jacobsen Henrik B, Pape Kristine, Fleten Nils, Jensen Chris, Fimland Marius S
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), P.B. 8905 MTFS, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Jul 1;46(4):364-372. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3882. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
Objectives This study aimed to investigate whether inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation (I-MORE) reduces sickness absence (SA) more than outpatient acceptance and commitment therapy (O-ACT) among individuals with musculoskeletal and mental health disorders. Methods Individuals on sick leave (2-12 months) due to musculoskeletal or common mental health disorders were randomized to I-MORE (N=86) or O-ACT (N=80). I-MORE lasted 3.5 weeks in which participants stayed at the rehabilitation center. I-MORE included ACT, physical exercise, work-related problem solving and creating a return to work plan. O-ACT consisted mainly of 6 weekly 2.5 hour group-ACT sessions. We assessed the primary outcome cumulative SA within 6 and 12 months with national registry-data. Secondary outcomes were time to sustainable return to work and self-reported health outcomes assessed by questionnaires. Results SA did not differ between the interventions at 6 months, but after one year individuals in I-MORE had 32 fewer SA days compared to O-ACT (median 85 [interquartile range 33-149] versus 117 [interquartile range 59-189)], P=0.034). The hazard ratio for sustainable return to work was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.0) in favor of I-MORE. There were no clinically meaningful between-group differences in self-reported health outcomes. Conclusions Among individuals on long-term SA due to musculoskeletal and common mental health disorders, a 3.5-week I-MORE program reduced SA compared with 6 weekly sessions of O-ACT in the year after inclusion. Studies with longer follow-up and economic evaluations should be performed.
目的 本研究旨在调查在患有肌肉骨骼和心理健康障碍的个体中,住院多模式职业康复(I-MORE)是否比门诊接受与承诺疗法(O-ACT)更能减少病假(SA)。方法 因肌肉骨骼或常见心理健康障碍而休病假(2至12个月)的个体被随机分为I-MORE组(N = 86)或O-ACT组(N = 80)。I-MORE持续3.5周,参与者留在康复中心。I-MORE包括接受与承诺疗法、体育锻炼、与工作相关的问题解决以及制定重返工作计划。O-ACT主要由每周一次、每次2.5小时的6次团体接受与承诺疗法课程组成。我们使用国家登记数据评估6个月和12个月内的主要结局累积病假天数。次要结局是可持续重返工作的时间以及通过问卷调查评估的自我报告健康结局。结果 在6个月时,两种干预措施之间的病假天数没有差异,但一年后,I-MORE组的个体比O-ACT组少32天病假(中位数85 [四分位间距33 - 149] 对 117 [四分位间距59 - 189]),P = 0.034)。I-MORE组可持续重返工作的风险比为1.9(95%置信区间1.2 - 3.0)。在自我报告的健康结局方面,两组之间没有具有临床意义的差异。结论 在因肌肉骨骼和常见心理健康障碍而长期休病假的个体中,与纳入后一年每周6次的O-ACT课程相比,为期3.5周的I-MORE计划减少了病假天数。应进行更长随访期的研究和经济评估。