Shenzhen Environmental Science and New Energy Technology Engineering Laboratory, Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Department of Economics, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8557-8569. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07515-7. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
Eco-efficiency plays a significant role in expressing how efficient the economic activity consumes nature's goods and services. To accurately measure eco-efficiency, the method slack-based measure modified three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) is adopted to evaluate environmental conditions in China's 30 provinces from year 2004 to 2016. This study treats carbon emissions and three industrials wastes as undesirable outputs and excludes the influences from external environment and random errors when make adjustments. Based on the results, this study makes the following conclusions: Firstly, industrial structure, trade openness, and population have negative effects on eco-efficiency while technology investment, urbanization process, foreign direct investment, and fiscal decentralization have positive effects on eco-efficiency. Secondly, the eco-efficiency for most provinces after adjusted is lower than the pre-adjusted, which indicates the overestimation in eco-efficiency when using traditional approaches. Thirdly, the eco-efficiency in China showed a clear geographical step distribution, with the highest eco-efficiency in the east area, followed by the central, northwest, and southwest regions.
生态效率在表达经济活动消耗自然商品和服务的效率方面起着重要作用。为了准确衡量生态效率,采用基于松弛的修正三阶段数据包络分析(DEA)方法来评估中国 30 个省份从 2004 年到 2016 年的环境状况。本研究将碳排放和三种工业废物视为不良产出,并在进行调整时排除外部环境和随机误差的影响。基于这些结果,本研究得出以下结论:首先,产业结构、贸易开放度和人口对生态效率有负面影响,而技术投资、城市化进程、外国直接投资和财政分权对生态效率有积极影响。其次,调整后的大多数省份的生态效率都低于调整前,这表明传统方法高估了生态效率。第三,中国的生态效率呈现出明显的地理阶梯分布,东部地区的生态效率最高,其次是中部、西北部和西南部地区。