Fanani Achmad, Setiawan Slamet, Purwati Oikurema, Maisarah Maisarah, Qoyyimah Uswatun
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum Jombang, Indonesia.
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia.
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 26;6(1):e03082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082. eCollection 2020 Jan.
This article presents an analysis of the nature of propositions made in President Trump's persuasive, yet controversial speech on Jerusalem from the perspective of mood analysis. The interpersonal relationships between the speaker and the audience concerning the building of and are revealed. It applies a discourse analysis with a qualitative approach to see how the President grammatically composed his and clauses. The results show that in the speech: 1) the clause was built by employing the declarative mood functioning as a statement to show his credibility; 2) the clauses were composed by implementing two moods: mostly declaratives which mainly functioned as statements, and few imperative moods to arouse both positive and negative feelings of the audience; 3) and the clauses were composed by using the declarative moods functioning as statements to give bases for his argumentation. The high use of declarative moods indicated that he positioned himself as an information bearer, to shorten the gap between him and his audience. Grammatically, the controversial side of the speech was mostly featured by several clauses containing negative elements such as blaming and negative polarity, especially when talking about previous US presidents and governments.
本文从语气分析的角度，对特朗普总统关于耶路撒冷的具有说服力但颇具争议的演讲中所提出的命题性质进行了分析。揭示了演讲者与听众之间在[此处原文缺失相关内容]建设方面的人际关系。它采用定性的语篇分析方法，来审视总统在语法上是如何构建他的[此处原文缺失相关内容]从句的。结果表明，在演讲中：1）[此处原文缺失相关内容]从句是通过使用陈述语气构建而成，用作陈述以展示他的可信度；2）[此处原文缺失相关内容]从句是通过运用两种语气构建的：大多是用作陈述的陈述语气，以及少数祈使语气以唤起听众的积极和消极情绪；3）[此处原文缺失相关内容]从句是通过使用用作陈述的陈述语气来为他的论证提供依据。陈述语气的大量使用表明他将自己定位为信息传递者，以缩短他与听众之间的距离。从语法上讲，演讲中颇具争议的一面主要体现在几个包含指责和否定极性等负面元素的从句中，尤其是在谈论美国历任总统和政府时。
