• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配子捐赠者对使用其配子所创造胚胎的决策权力。

Decisional authority of gamete donors over embryos created with their gametes.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Feb;37(2):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01678-5. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10815-019-01678-5
PMID:31909445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7056770/
Abstract

In the ongoing discussion on the rights and obligations of gamete donors, scant attention has been paid to the decisional authority of gamete donors over the disposition of the embryos created with their gametes. This paper analyses four different positions: three cases relate to the disposition options for surplus or unused embryos by the first recipients, and one case relates to the use of the embryos stored by the first recipients for procreation.We conclude that the gamete donor causally contributes to the creation of the embryos and thus becomes indirectly responsible. To avoid that donors would become accomplices to an activity to which they morally object, a qualified generic consent mentioning types of research should be obtained. No consent from the donor is required for the destruction of the embryos.The cancellation of the agreement by anonymous or identifiable gamete donors should not be possible for embryos in storage for reproduction by the recipients. The interests in not becoming a genetic parent against one's wishes do not outweigh the damage done to recipients who would no longer be able to use their embryos. Known donors, on the contrary, should be able to withdraw their consent up to the moment of transfer of the embryos based on the greater harm caused to them as a consequence of attributional parenthood. They should also be able to veto transfer of the embryos to other people than the original recipients.

摘要

在关于配子捐赠者的权利和义务的持续讨论中,配子捐赠者对其配子所创造的胚胎处置的决策权威几乎没有得到关注。本文分析了四种不同的立场:三种情况涉及第一受体对剩余或未使用的胚胎的处置选择,一种情况涉及第一受体储存的胚胎用于生育的用途。我们的结论是,配子捐赠者因果地促成了胚胎的创造,因此间接地负有责任。为了避免捐赠者成为他们在道德上反对的活动的同谋,应该获得一份提及研究类型的有条件的一般同意。对于要销毁的胚胎,不需要捐赠者的同意。匿名或可识别的配子捐赠者不应取消储存用于受体繁殖的胚胎的协议。与违背自己意愿成为遗传父母的利益相比,不会对那些将不再能够使用自己胚胎的接受者造成更大的伤害。相反,已知的捐赠者应该能够在胚胎转移之前基于归因性父母身份给他们造成的更大伤害撤回同意,直至转移胚胎为止。他们还应该能够否决将胚胎转移给除原始接受者以外的其他人。

相似文献

1
Decisional authority of gamete donors over embryos created with their gametes.配子捐赠者对使用其配子所创造胚胎的决策权力。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Feb;37(2):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01678-5. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Interests, obligations, and rights in gamete and embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion.配子和胚胎捐赠的利益、义务和权利:伦理委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
3
Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients?配子和胚胎捐赠用于研究:是什么影响配子捐赠者和接受者的捐赠意愿?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Sep;39(9):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02569-y. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
Dual consent? Donors' and recipients' views about involvement in decision-making on the use of embryos created by gamete donation in research.双重同意?供体和受体对参与配子捐赠胚胎用于研究的决策的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0430-6.
5
The ethics of embryo donation: what are the moral similarities and differences of surplus embryo donation and double gamete donation?胚胎捐赠的伦理问题:剩余胚胎捐赠和双配子捐赠的道德相似性和差异性是什么?
Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct 1;35(10):2171-2178. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa166.
6
Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation.人类胚胎捐赠中的伦理和法律问题。
Fertil Steril. 1995 Nov;64(5):885-94. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57897-2.
7
Debate in embryo donation: embryo donation or both-gamete donation?胚胎捐赠中的争论:胚胎捐赠还是配子双捐赠?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 1:29-33. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60061-2.
8
The point of no return: Up to what point should we be allowed to withdraw consent to the storage and use of embryos and gametes?不可挽回点:我们应该在多大程度上被允许撤回对胚胎和配子的储存和使用的同意?
Bioethics. 2019 Jul;33(6):637-643. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12572. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion.告知配子或胚胎捐赠受孕的后代:伦理委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.配子捐赠者补偿的限制:一项公众意见调查。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1355-1363.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The first years of the Finnish Act on Assisted Fertility Treatments--observations from the viewpoint of a supervisory authority.芬兰辅助生育治疗法案实施的头几年——监管机构视角的观察
Med Law. 2012 Sep;31(3):473-89.