Jain Rishi, Vijayvergia Namrata, Devarajan Karthik, Lewis Bianca, Denlinger Crystal S, Cohen Steven J, Dotan Efrat
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 May;11(4):640-646. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
While a number of landmark clinical trials have led to the approval of combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), older patients are underrepresented in these studies. We evaluated changes in practice patterns in the management of mPC among medical oncologists in the combination chemotherapy era (CCE).
A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. The cohort was divided into two groups (Pre-CCE, diagnosed with mPC between 2000 and 2009 and Post-CCE, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015). Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were conducted to determine the impact of treatment and prognostic variables on survival.
473 older patients with mPC were identified. Post-CCE, there were statistically significant increases in the use of chemotherapy (p < .005). While usage of gemcitabine was similar between groups, use of fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan increased Post-CCE. Use of chemotherapy conferred a modest but significant survival benefit (5 months Pre-CCE versus 6 months Post-CCE, p < .005). UVA and MVA showed significantly improved survival when older patients were treated with 2 or more chemotherapeutic agents.
Despite the limited data available to guide clinicians on optimal usage of these treatments in older patients, medical oncology practice patterns for mPC have changed at an academic cancer center. Increases in chemotherapy use seems to confer a small survival benefit. Additional prospective data in older patients is necessary to improve our management of older patients with mPC.
尽管多项具有里程碑意义的临床试验促使转移性胰腺腺癌(mPC)联合化疗方案获批,但老年患者在这些研究中的代表性不足。我们评估了联合化疗时代(CCE)内科肿瘤学家对mPC治疗的实践模式变化。
对2000年至2015年在一家三级癌症中心接受治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。该队列分为两组(CCE前组,2000年至2009年诊断为mPC;CCE后组,2010年至2015年诊断)。采用Fisher精确检验比较分类变量。进行单因素(UVA)和多因素分析(MVA)以确定治疗和预后变量对生存的影响。
共识别出473例老年mPC患者。CCE后,化疗的使用有统计学显著增加(p <.005)。虽然两组间吉西他滨的使用相似,但CCE后氟嘧啶、铂类、紫杉烷和伊立替康的使用增加。化疗的使用带来了适度但显著的生存获益(CCE前为5个月,CCE后为6个月,p <.005)。UVA和MVA显示,老年患者接受2种或更多化疗药物治疗时生存显著改善。
尽管指导临床医生在老年患者中最佳使用这些治疗的数据有限,但在一家学术癌症中心,mPC的内科肿瘤学实践模式已发生变化。化疗使用的增加似乎带来了较小的生存获益。需要更多关于老年患者的前瞻性数据来改善我们对老年mPC患者的管理。