Zahrt Octavia H, Crum Alia J
Department of Organizational Behavior, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Dec 9;17:101027. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101027. eCollection 2020 Mar.
This research sought to understand if physical activity recommendations--an integral component of many interventions aiming to promote physical activity--may have unexpected effects on individuals' mindsets (in this case about the adequacy and health consequences of their physical activity) that can strengthen or weaken recommendation effectiveness. Participants were students and staff at a U.S. West Coast private university, recruited between 2016 and 2019. Two experiments with one-week follow-up periods investigated the effects of viewing recommendations that prescribe a lower (vs. higher) amount of physical activity and provide a liberal (vs. stringent) definition of what counts as physical activity on individuals' mindsets about the adequacy and health consequences of their physical activity, as well as physical activity-related self-efficacy, physical activity behavior, and perceived health. Study 1 ( = 157) showed that exposure to low-and-liberal recommendations (vs. high-and-stringent recommendations) caused participants to adopt the mindset that their physical activity was more adequate, which in turn predicted greater engagement in physical activity and perceived health one week later. Study 2 ( = 272) showed that regardless of definition of physical activity (liberal vs. stringent), a lower (vs. higher) amount of recommended physical activity led participants to adopt the mindset that their activity was more adequate. This more adaptive mindset predicted greater self-efficacy and engagement in physical activity in the following week, in addition to better perceived health. Rather than inducing complacency, recommendations prescribing a relatively lower (vs. higher) amount of physical activity may be more effective at promoting physical activity and health by inducing adaptive mindsets.
本研究旨在了解体育活动建议(许多旨在促进体育活动的干预措施的一个组成部分)是否可能对个人的心态产生意想不到的影响(在本案例中是关于他们体育活动的充足性和健康后果),从而增强或削弱建议的有效性。参与者是美国西海岸一所私立大学的学生和教职员工,于2016年至2019年招募。两项为期一周随访期的实验调查了查看规定较低(相对于较高)体育活动量以及对体育活动的定义较为宽松(相对于严格)的建议,对个人关于其体育活动的充足性和健康后果的心态、与体育活动相关的自我效能感、体育活动行为以及感知健康的影响。研究1(n = 157)表明,接触低量且宽松的建议(相对于高量且严格的建议)会使参与者形成一种心态,即他们的体育活动更充足,这反过来又预示着一周后他们会更多地参与体育活动并拥有更好的感知健康。研究2(n = 272)表明,无论体育活动的定义是宽松还是严格,较低(相对于较高)量的建议体育活动都会使参与者形成一种心态,即他们的活动更充足。这种更具适应性的心态预示着在接下来的一周里会有更高的自我效能感和更多地参与体育活动,同时也有更好的感知健康。规定相对较低(相对于较高)量体育活动的建议,与其说是会导致自满,不如说可能通过诱导适应性心态,在促进体育活动和健康方面更有效。