Tallet Céline, Rakotomahandry Marine, Herlemont Sabine, Prunier Armelle
PEGASE, INRA, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Saint Gilles, France.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Dec 11;6:462. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00462. eCollection 2019.
Tail docking is widely performed in pig farms to prevent tail biting. We investigated the consequences of this practice on behavioral indicators of pain and stress, and on the human-piglet relationship during lactation. Within 19 litters, piglets (1-3 days of age) were submitted on day 0 (D0) to docking with a cautery iron (D), sham-docking (S), or no docking (U). Piglets from the D and S groups were observed during the procedure (body movements and vocalizations) and just after, in isolation, during 20 s for body, tail and ear postures as well as ear movements. Piglets from the three treatments were observed in their home pen after docking on D0 and D3 afternoon for body posture, tail posture and movements. Piglets from the D and U groups were observed on D6, D12, D19, and D26 in their home pen for oral behavior, body, and tail posture. Tail damage and tear staining were scored on D5, D11, D18, and D25. A 5-min motionless human test was performed on D14. During the procedure, D piglets screamed more and with a higher intensity ( < 0.05) than S piglets ( = 48-50). Just after docking, D piglets held their ears in a posture perpendicular to the head-tail axis and changed their ear posture more often ( < 0.05). Between D6 and D26, D piglets kept their tail immobile ( < 0.001) and in a horizontal position ( < 0.01) more often than U piglets ( = 45-47). Between D11 and D25, U piglets had higher scores for tail damage and damage freshness than D piglets (0.09 < < 0.02) whereas tear-stain score was similar. In the human test, D piglets interacted later with an unfamiliar human than U piglets ( = 0.01, = 18/group). Present data indicate signs of acute pain and stress in piglets due to docking during the procedure itself and adverse consequences throughout lactation thereafter, including on their relationship with humans. On the other hand, the presence of tail lesions shows that undocked piglets are subject to more tail biting, even before weaning.
断尾在养猪场中广泛施行,以防止咬尾行为。我们研究了这种做法对疼痛和应激行为指标的影响,以及对哺乳期仔猪与人类关系的影响。在19窝仔猪中,0日龄(D0)的仔猪(1 - 3日龄)被分为三组:用烙铁断尾(D组)、假断尾(S组)或不断尾(U组)。在断尾过程中观察D组和S组仔猪(身体动作和叫声),断尾后立即将其单独隔离观察20秒,记录身体、尾巴和耳朵的姿势以及耳朵的动作。在D0和D3下午断尾后,观察三组处理的仔猪在其猪栏中的身体姿势、尾巴姿势和动作。在D6、D12、D19和D26观察D组和U组仔猪在其猪栏中的口腔行为、身体和尾巴姿势。在D5、D11、D18和D25对尾巴损伤和泪痕进行评分。在D14进行5分钟的与陌生人互动测试。断尾过程中,D组仔猪比S组仔猪叫得更多且叫声强度更高(P < 0.05)(每组n = 48 - 50)。断尾后,D组仔猪耳朵保持与头尾轴垂直的姿势,且耳朵姿势变化更频繁(P < 0.05)。在D6至D26期间,D组仔猪尾巴比U组仔猪更常保持不动(P < 0.001)且处于水平位置(P < 0.01)(每组n = 45 - 47)。在D11至D25期间,U组仔猪尾巴损伤和损伤新鲜度评分高于D组仔猪(0.09 < P < 0.02),而泪痕评分相似。在与陌生人互动测试中,D组仔猪比U组仔猪与陌生人互动的时间更晚(P = 0.01,每组n = 18)。现有数据表明,仔猪在断尾过程中会出现急性疼痛和应激迹象,且在整个哺乳期会产生不良后果,包括对其与人类关系的影响。另一方面,尾巴损伤的存在表明,不断尾的仔猪即使在断奶前也更容易被咬尾。