• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Datasets on statistical analysis and performance evaluation of backtracking search optimisation algorithm compared with its counterpart algorithms.与回溯搜索优化算法的对应算法相比,关于回溯搜索优化算法的统计分析和性能评估的数据集。
Data Brief. 2019 Dec 23;28:105046. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105046. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Optimal coordinated voltage control in active distribution networks using backtracking search algorithm.基于回溯搜索算法的有源配电网最优协调电压控制
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0177507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177507. eCollection 2017.
3
Particle Swarm Optimisation: A Historical Review Up to the Current Developments.粒子群优化算法:从历史回顾到当前发展
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;22(3):362. doi: 10.3390/e22030362.
4
Improving Vector Evaluated Particle Swarm Optimisation by incorporating nondominated solutions.通过纳入非支配解改进向量评估粒子群优化算法。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 May 7;2013:510763. doi: 10.1155/2013/510763. Print 2013.
5
A Bio-Inspired Multi-Population-Based Adaptive Backtracking Search Algorithm.一种基于生物启发的多群体自适应回溯搜索算法。
Cognit Comput. 2022;14(2):900-925. doi: 10.1007/s12559-021-09984-w. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
6
The backtracking search optimization algorithm for frequency band and time segment selection in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces.基于运动想象的脑机接口中频段和时间段选择的回溯搜索优化算法
J Integr Neurosci. 2016 Sep;15(3):347-364. doi: 10.1142/S0219635216500229. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
7
A room-oriented artificial bee colony algorithm for optimizing the patient admission scheduling problem.面向病房的人工蜂群算法优化患者入院调度问题
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Sep;148:105850. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105850. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
A self adaptive hybrid enhanced artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous optimization problems.一种用于连续优化问题的自适应混合增强人工蜂群算法。
Biosystems. 2015 Jun;132-133:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Genetic Bee Colony (GBC) algorithm: A new gene selection method for microarray cancer classification.遗传蜂群(GBC)算法:一种用于微阵列癌症分类的新基因选择方法。
Comput Biol Chem. 2015 Jun;56:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
Modified artificial bee colony for the vehicle routing problems with time windows.用于带时间窗车辆路径问题的改进人工蜂群算法
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 9;5(1):1298. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2940-8. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel groundnut leaf dataset for detection and classification of groundnut leaf diseases.一个用于花生叶部病害检测与分类的新型花生叶数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Jul 20;55:110763. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110763. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
An introduction of preference based stepping ahead firefly algorithm for the uncapacitated examination timetabling.基于偏好的向前步进萤火虫算法在无容量限制考试时间表安排中的应用介绍
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Sep 2;8:e1068. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1068. eCollection 2022.
3
Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 social media data through machine learning.通过机器学习对新冠疫情社交媒体数据进行情感分析。
Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81(29):42261-42283. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13492-w. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Automating fake news detection using PPCA and levy flight-based LSTM.使用概率主成分分析(PPCA)和基于莱维飞行的长短期记忆网络(LSTM)实现假新闻检测自动化。
Soft comput. 2022;26(22):12545-12557. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07215-4. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
5
A novel cluster detection of COVID-19 patients and medical disease conditions using improved evolutionary clustering algorithm star.一种使用改进的进化聚类算法star对新冠肺炎患者和内科疾病状况进行新型聚类检测的方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104866. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104866. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Performance evaluation results of evolutionary clustering algorithm star for clustering heterogeneous datasets.用于对异构数据集进行聚类的进化聚类算法star的性能评估结果。
Data Brief. 2021 Apr 6;36:107044. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107044. eCollection 2021 Jun.

与回溯搜索优化算法的对应算法相比,关于回溯搜索优化算法的统计分析和性能评估的数据集。

Datasets on statistical analysis and performance evaluation of backtracking search optimisation algorithm compared with its counterpart algorithms.

作者信息

Hassan Bryar A, Rashid Tarik A

机构信息

Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research, Sulaimani, Iraq.

Department of Computer Networks, Technical College of Informatics, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaimani, Iraq.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2019 Dec 23;28:105046. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105046. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2019.105046
PMID:31921951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6948123/
Abstract

In this data article, we present the data used to evaluate the statistical success of the backtracking search optimisation algorithm (BSA) in comparison with the other four evolutionary optimisation algorithms. The data presented in this data article is related to the research article entitles 'Operational Framework for Recent Advances in Backtracking Search Optimisation Algorithm: A Systematic Review and Performance Evaluation' [1]. Three statistical tests conducted on BSA compared to differential evolution algorithm (DE), particle swarm optimisation (PSO), artificial bee colony (ABC), and firefly algorithm (FF). The tests are used to evaluate these mentioned algorithms and to determine which one could solve a specific optimisation problem concerning the statistical success of 16 benchmark problems taking several criteria into account. The criteria are initializing control parameters, dimension of the problems, their search space, and number of iterations needed to minimise a problem, the performance of the computer used to code the algorithms and their programming style, getting a balance on the effect of randomization, and the use of different type of optimisation problem in terms of hardness and their cohort. In addition, all the three tests include necessary statistical measures (Mean: mean-solution, S.D.: standard-deviation of mean-solution, Best: the best solution, Worst: the worst solution, Exec. Time: mean runtime in seconds, No. of succeeds: number of successful minimisation, and No. of Failure: number of failed minimisation).

摘要

在本数据文章中,我们展示了用于评估回溯搜索优化算法(BSA)与其他四种进化优化算法相比在统计方面成功与否的数据。本数据文章中呈现的数据与题为《回溯搜索优化算法最新进展的操作框架:系统综述与性能评估》[1]的研究文章相关。对BSA与差分进化算法(DE)、粒子群优化算法(PSO)、人工蜂群算法(ABC)和萤火虫算法(FF)进行了三项统计测试。这些测试用于评估上述算法,并确定哪一种算法能够在考虑多个标准的情况下解决关于16个基准问题统计成功性的特定优化问题。这些标准包括初始化控制参数、问题的维度、搜索空间、最小化问题所需的迭代次数、用于编写算法的计算机性能及其编程风格、在随机化影响方面取得平衡,以及在硬度及其类别方面使用不同类型的优化问题。此外,所有这三项测试都包括必要的统计度量(均值:平均解、标准差:平均解的标准差、最佳:最佳解、最差:最差解、执行时间:以秒为单位的平均运行时间、成功次数:成功最小化的次数,以及失败次数:失败最小化的次数)。