Stafeev A A, Ryakhovsky A N, Petrov P O, Chikunov S O, Khizhuk A V
Omsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia, Omsk, Russia.
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2019;98(6):83-89. doi: 10.17116/stomat20199806183.
To compare the precision of centric relation (CR) assessment by various methods using digital technologies.
Determination of the CR was carried out in the clinic of prosthetic dentistry on patients with intact dentition using methods of bilateral manipulation, anterior jig, leaf gauge and device for intraoral recording of the gothic arch angle. Optical jaw impressions were obtained using the intraoral 3D scanner Trios (3Shape) and the CR registers were scanned using the laboratory scanner Prime (DOF). To evaluate the reproducibility of the CR, the computer program of 3D modeling Avantis (Russia) was used, which integrated the obtained optical impressions and digital copies of the CR registers.
None of the methods showed 100% accuracy in CR assessment. The most stable reproducibility of the position of the mandible in the CR relative to the first registration was determined by the method using an anterior jig (of our own design) and amounted to 0.119±0.012 mm, which is significantly less than using the methods of bilateral manipulation (0.225±0.028, p≤0.05) and a leaf gauge (0.207±0.02, p≤0.05). We observed a similar mean values of the reproduction accuracy when determining the CR by recording the Gothic arch angle (0,120±0,013, p≤0.05), which also has a significantly lower value (p≤0.05) compared to other methods for CR determining.
使用数字技术比较通过各种方法评估正中关系(CR)的精度。
在口腔修复科诊所,对牙列完整的患者采用双侧手法、前导装置、叶状规以及哥特式弓角口内记录装置等方法来确定CR。使用口内3D扫描仪Trios(3Shape)获取光学颌面部印模,并使用实验室扫描仪Prime(DOF)扫描CR记录。为评估CR的可重复性,使用了3D建模计算机程序Avantis(俄罗斯),该程序整合了获取的光学印模和CR记录的数字副本。
在CR评估中,没有一种方法显示出100%的准确性。使用前导装置(自行设计)的方法确定下颌在CR中相对于首次记录的位置具有最稳定的可重复性,为0.119±0.012毫米,这明显低于使用双侧手法的方法(0.225±0.028,p≤0.05)和叶状规的方法(0.207±0.02,p≤0.05)。通过记录哥特式弓角确定CR时,我们观察到类似的再现精度平均值(0.120±0.013,p≤0.05),与其他确定CR的方法相比,该值也显著更低(p≤0.05)。