• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高巴西医院阴道分娩频率的质量改进计划。

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals.

机构信息

Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, Massachusetts; Departamento Materno Infantil, Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein, São Paulo, and Agencia Nacional de Saude Suplementar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; and the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):415-425. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003619.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003619
PMID:31923054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7012340/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a quality improvement (QI) initiative designed to increase the frequency of vaginal delivery in Brazilian hospitals.

METHODS

Twenty-eight hospitals enrolled in a 20-month (May 2015-December 2016) Breakthrough Series Collaborative that used QI methods to increase implementation of obstetric approaches with potential to increase the frequency of vaginal delivery. All hospitals contributed qualitative data for iterative redesign. Thirteen intervention hospitals with complete data contributed to an analysis of changes in vaginal delivery in a targeted population over time. Hospitals from the São Paulo region (five intervention and eight nonintervention) contributed to a comparator analysis of changes in vaginal delivery for all deliveries over time.

INTERVENTION

Most hospitals targeted low-risk pregnancies in primiparous women, delivered by hospital-employed obstetricians or admitted through emergency departments, and some included all pregnant women. The collaborative tested four interventions to increase vaginal delivery: 1) coalition building of stakeholders with the common purpose of ensuring "appropriate delivery," 2) empowering pregnant women to choose their preferred mode of delivery, 3) implementation of new care models favoring physiologic birth, and 4) improved information systems for continuous learning by health care providers.

RESULTS

For 119,378 targeted deliveries (36% of all deliveries) in 13 intervention hospitals, vaginal delivery increased from 21.5% in 2014 to 34.8% in 2016, a relative increase of 1.62 (95% CI 1.27-2.07, P<.001). In the comparator analysis, vaginal delivery for all deliveries in the five São Paulo intervention hospitals increased from 16.1% to 23% (RI 1.43, P<.001) and from 11.0% to 13.0% (relative rate ratio 1.18, P<.001) in the eight nonintervention São Paulo hospitals. The relative increase in vaginal delivery between the São Paulo intervention and nonintervention groups was 1.21 (95% CI 1.05-1.41, P=.01). The rate of maternal adverse events and neonatal intensive care unit admissions for newborns who weighed at least 2,500 g did not differ significantly during the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Key interventions implemented with QI methods were associated with increased vaginal delivery. This approach may help address the global cesarean delivery epidemic.

摘要

目的

评估一项旨在提高巴西医院阴道分娩率的质量改进(QI)计划。

方法

28 家医院参与了为期 20 个月(2015 年 5 月至 2016 年 12 月)的突破性系列协作,该协作使用 QI 方法来增加具有增加阴道分娩可能性的产科方法的实施。所有医院都为迭代重新设计提供了定性数据。13 家有完整数据的干预医院对目标人群中阴道分娩的时间变化进行了分析。来自圣保罗地区的医院(5 家干预医院和 8 家非干预医院)对所有分娩中阴道分娩的时间变化进行了比较分析。

干预措施

大多数医院针对初产妇的低风险妊娠,由医院雇用的产科医生分娩或通过急诊部门入院,一些医院还包括所有孕妇。该协作测试了四项增加阴道分娩的干预措施:1)建立有共同目标的利益相关者联盟,确保“适当分娩”;2)赋予孕妇选择自己喜欢的分娩方式的权力;3)实施有利于生理分娩的新护理模式;4)改进医疗保健提供者的持续学习信息系统。

结果

在 13 家干预医院的 119378 例目标分娩(占所有分娩的 36%)中,阴道分娩率从 2014 年的 21.5%上升到 2016 年的 34.8%,相对增加了 1.62(95%CI 1.27-2.07,P<.001)。在比较分析中,圣保罗 5 家干预医院所有分娩中阴道分娩率从 16.1%上升到 23%(RI 1.43,P<.001),从 11.0%上升到 13.0%(相对率比 1.18,P<.001)圣保罗的 8 家非干预医院。圣保罗干预组和非干预组之间阴道分娩的相对增加率为 1.21(95%CI 1.05-1.41,P=.01)。在观察期间,新生儿体重至少为 2500 克的产妇不良事件和新生儿重症监护病房入院率无显著差异。

结论

实施质量改进方法的关键干预措施与阴道分娩率的增加有关。这种方法可能有助于解决全球剖宫产率过高的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/10e37ce1fcb8/ong-135-415-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/8810347dfe2c/ong-135-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/67a2082fda12/ong-135-415-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/10e37ce1fcb8/ong-135-415-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/8810347dfe2c/ong-135-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/67a2082fda12/ong-135-415-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3b/7012340/10e37ce1fcb8/ong-135-415-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals.提高巴西医院阴道分娩频率的质量改进计划。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):415-425. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003619.
2
Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.巴西私立医院中女性对阴道分娩的偏好:一项质量改进项目的效果。
Reprod Health. 2024 Mar 28;20(Suppl 2):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01771-8.
3
Pregnancy outcome and factors affecting vaginal delivery of twins at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu.尼日利亚大学教学医院(位于埃努古)的双胎妊娠结局及影响经阴道分娩的因素
Niger J Clin Pract. 2013 Oct-Dec;16(4):490-5. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.116895.
4
The effects of a quality improvement project to reduce caesarean sections in selected private hospitals in Brazil.巴西部分私立医院质量改进项目对剖宫产率的影响。
Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 4;20(Suppl 2):194. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01851-9.
5
Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.阴道臀位分娩:一项前瞻性登记研究的结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jul 24;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-153.
6
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.是否选择剖宫产?产妇年龄与足月时不良结局风险:一项基于人群的低风险初产妇登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.
7
[Obstetric delivery and risk of neonatal mortality in Goiânia in 2000, Brazil].
Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Jun;39(3):350-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102005000300004. Epub 2005 Jun 30.
8
Comparison of obstetrical interventions in women with vaginal and cesarean section delivered: cross-sectional study in a reference tertiary center in the Northeast of Brazil.经阴道分娩与剖宫产分娩女性的产科干预措施比较:巴西东北部一家三级转诊中心的横断面研究。
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Spring;84(3):201-207.
9
The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study.世界上最糟糕的事情都发生了——双胞胎妊娠中的联合分娩:一项随机、对照、前瞻性研究的子分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):353.e1-353.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.047. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
[Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].[新疆维吾尔族妇女既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的调查]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;49(10):736-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a multifaceted intervention with audit and feedback on low-risk childbirth practice: a multicentre prospective study.多方面干预结合审核与反馈对低风险分娩实践的影响:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 14;25(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07681-2.
2
Reducing caesarean section rates in Robson groups 1 and 3: a quality improvement initiative in a private Brazilian hospital.降低罗布森分类法第1组和第3组的剖宫产率:巴西一家私立医院的质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 4;14(1):e003077. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003077.
3
Quality improvement collaborative to increase access to caesarean sections: lessons from Bihar, India.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates.大规模改善合作以降低初产妇剖宫产率的安全性评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):613-623. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003109.
2
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol.评价巴西私立医院产时护理质量改进干预措施的效果:研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2018 Nov 26;15(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y.
3
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.
提高剖宫产可及性的质量改进协作:来自印度比哈尔邦的经验教训
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 May 19;34(6):404-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017454.
4
The effects of a quality improvement project to reduce caesarean sections in selected private hospitals in Brazil.巴西部分私立医院质量改进项目对剖宫产率的影响。
Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 4;20(Suppl 2):194. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01851-9.
5
Appropriate Delivery Project: Impact of Simulation Training on the Increase in Vaginal Births in Hospitals in Brazil.适宜分娩项目:模拟培训对增加巴西医院阴道分娩的影响。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 9;22:eAO0783. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0783. eCollection 2024.
6
Association between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery.饮食炎症指数与剖宫产风险之间的关联。
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Jul;53(7):1621-1628. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i7.16056.
7
An implementation analysis of a quality improvement project to reduce cesarean section in Brazilian private hospitals.巴西私立医院降低剖宫产率质量改进项目的实施分析
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 26;20(Suppl 2):190. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01773-6.
8
Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.巴西私立医院中女性对阴道分娩的偏好:一项质量改进项目的效果。
Reprod Health. 2024 Mar 28;20(Suppl 2):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01771-8.
9
Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis.针对孕妇的教育干预措施以优化剖宫产的使用:关键要素是什么?一项定性比较分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):1851. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0.
10
Impact of an intrapartum care quality improvement intervention in Brazilian private hospitals on care safety measures and adverse outcomes.巴西私立医院产时护理质量改进干预对护理安全措施和不良结局的影响。
Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(Suppl 2):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01541-4.
全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
4
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
5
Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies.针对组织、机构和系统的减少不必要剖宫产术的非临床干预措施:定性研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0203274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203274. eCollection 2018.
6
Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.女性和社区对减少不必要剖宫产的针对性教育干预措施的看法:定性证据综合评价。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 24;15(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0570-z.
7
Relationship Between Labor and Delivery Unit Management Practices and Maternal Outcomes.分娩单元管理实践与孕产妇结局之间的关系
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):358-365. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002128.
8
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.利用罗伯逊分类法进行审核和反馈以降低剖宫产率:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Leading Change on Labor and Delivery: Reducing Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV) Cesarean Rates.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Feb;43(2):51-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.