Suppr超能文献

比较阿尔茨海默病患者与非患者在情绪斯特鲁普任务中的干扰效应。

Comparing the Effect of Interference on an Emotional Stroop Task in Older Adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease.

机构信息

Department of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(4):1445-1453. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190989.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impairments in the ability to recognize facial affective expressions may lead to social dysfunction and difficulties with interpersonal communication.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the attentional responses on a Stroop emotional task using words and faces by testing whether the two stimuli differ in the degree of interference they produce in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

There were 75 participants: 25 healthy older adults, 25 with mild AD, and 25 with moderate AD. A variation of the classic emotional Stroop test was administered. This task combined emotional words (happy or sad) superimposed on facial expressions (happy or sad), where the words were either incongruent or congruent with the emotion expressed by the face stimuli.

RESULTS

Facilitation was shown on negative words in healthy older adults, and significant effects were obtained for condition, valence, group, and the condition x group interaction. Although less interference was observed on negative stimuli, the fastest reaction times were found for congruent positive stimuli. The effect of interference in healthy older adults is similar in both conditions. However, in the AD groups, there is less interference on the words task than on the faces task.

CONCLUSION

The more complex nature of faces, as opposed to the over-learning and automaticity of words, may explain the higher interference in AD patients in the faces condition. In patients with AD, words can be a better method for recognizing emotions than affective facial expressions.

摘要

背景

识别面部情感表达的能力受损可能导致社交功能障碍和人际沟通困难。

目的

通过测试阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者对单词和面孔的斯特鲁普情绪任务的注意力反应是否存在差异,比较使用单词和面孔进行斯特鲁普情绪任务的注意力反应,以确定这两种刺激在产生干扰的程度上是否存在差异。

方法

共有 75 名参与者:25 名健康老年人、25 名轻度 AD 患者和 25 名中度 AD 患者。进行了经典情绪斯特鲁普测试的变体。该任务将情感词(快乐或悲伤)叠加在面部表情(快乐或悲伤)上,其中这些词与面部表情所表达的情绪要么一致,要么不一致。

结果

健康老年人在消极单词上表现出促进作用,并且在条件、效价、组和条件 x 组交互作用方面都得到了显著的效果。尽管对消极刺激的干扰较小,但对一致的积极刺激的反应最快。在健康老年人中,两种条件下的干扰效应相似。然而,在 AD 组中,与面孔任务相比,单词任务的干扰较小。

结论

与单词的过度学习和自动化相比,面孔的复杂性可能解释了 AD 患者在面孔条件下更高的干扰。在 AD 患者中,单词可能比情感面部表情更能有效地识别情绪。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验