Suppr超能文献

组织硬度与疼痛体验无关:一项针对慢性颈痛和背痛患者的个体对照研究。

Tissue Stiffness is Not Related to Pain Experience: An Individually Controlled Study in Patients with Chronic Neck and Back Pain.

作者信息

Lederer Ann-Kathrin, Maly Christian, Weinert Tomas, Huber Roman

机构信息

University Medical Center of Freiburg, Institute for Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Center for Complementary Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Dec 21;2019:1907168. doi: 10.1155/2019/1907168. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massage therapies such as cupping are often applied in patients with chronic neck and back pain with the assumption that they can reduce increased tissue stiffness and, therefore, improve pain. The aim of this study was to clarify whether tissue stiffness is related to pain experience in patients with chronic (>3 months) back and neck pain and whether it can be altered by a cupping massage.

METHODS

The tissue stiffness of the point of subjectively felt maximum pain intensity of 40 patients with neck ( = 20) or lower back pain ( = 20) was measured by a myometer. Exact contralateral side served as an individual control. Side of higher stiffness was then treated with a cupping massage. 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes as well as 24 hours after treatment, tissue stiffness was measured again. Patients rated their pain on a standardized pain questionnaire (neck pain disability score (NDI) or Oswestry disability index (ODI), respectively) before and 24 hours after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to the contralateral control side, the more painful side did not exhibit an increased stiffness of myofascial tissue before treatment (=0.827). The tissue stiffness and the side difference between treated and nontreated control sides decreased significantly after cupping (=0.002 and =0.001, respectively) but returned to baseline after 24 hours. NDI and ODI scores significantly decreased 24 hours after cupping (NDI: =0.012, ODI: =0.002).

CONCLUSION

Tissue stiffness might not be related to pain experience in patients with chronic neck and lower back pain. Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00011281).

摘要

背景

诸如拔罐等按摩疗法常用于慢性颈痛和背痛患者,人们认为这些疗法可以降低组织僵硬程度,从而缓解疼痛。本研究的目的是阐明组织僵硬与慢性(>3个月)颈痛和背痛患者的疼痛体验是否相关,以及拔罐按摩是否能改变组织僵硬程度。

方法

使用肌动计测量40例颈部(n = 20)或下背部疼痛(n = 20)患者主观感觉疼痛强度最大点的组织僵硬程度。对侧作为个体对照。然后对僵硬程度较高的一侧进行拔罐按摩治疗。治疗后5、10、15和20分钟以及24小时,再次测量组织僵硬程度。患者在治疗前和治疗后24小时分别根据标准化疼痛问卷(分别为颈部疼痛残疾评分(NDI)或奥斯维斯特残疾指数(ODI))对疼痛进行评分。

结果

与对侧对照相比,治疗前疼痛更严重的一侧肌筋膜组织僵硬程度并未增加(P = 0.827)。拔罐后组织僵硬程度以及治疗侧与未治疗对照侧之间的差异均显著降低(分别为P = 0.002和P = 0.001),但24小时后恢复至基线水平。拔罐24小时后NDI和ODI评分显著降低(NDI:P = 0.012,ODI:P = 0.002)。

结论

组织僵硬可能与慢性颈痛和下背痛患者的疼痛体验无关。试验注册:德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00011281)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e8b/6942862/9b3e172ed82a/ECAM2019-1907168.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验