Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation, University of Duisburg-Essen, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276 Essen, Germany.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Aug 15;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-63.
In this preliminary trial we investigated the effects of dry cupping, an ancient method for treating pain syndromes, on patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Sensory mechanical thresholds and the participants' self-reported outcome measures of pain and quality of life were evaluated.
Fifty patients (50.5 ± 11.9 years) were randomised to a treatment group (TG) or a waiting-list control group (WL). Patients in the TG received a series of 5 cupping treatments over a period of 2 weeks; the control group did not. Self-reported outcome measures before and after the cupping series included the following: Pain at rest (PR) and maximal pain related to movement (PM) on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pain diary (PD) data on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). In addition, the mechanical-detection thresholds (MDT), vibration-detection thresholds (VDT), and pressure-pain thresholds (PPT) were determined at pain-related and control areas.
Patients of the TG had significantly less pain after cupping therapy than patients of the WL group (PR: Δ-22.5 mm, p = 0.00002; PM: Δ-17.8 mm, p = 0.01). Pain diaries (PD) revealed that neck pain decreased gradually in the TG patients and that pain reported by the two groups differed significantly after the fifth cupping session (Δ-1.1, p = 0.001). There were also significant differences in the SF-36 subscales for bodily pain (Δ13.8, p = 0.006) and vitality (Δ10.2, p = 0.006). Group differences in PPT were significant at pain-related and control areas (all p < 0.05), but were not significant for MDT or VDT.
A series of five dry cupping treatments appeared to be effective in relieving chronic non-specific neck pain. Not only subjective measures improved, but also mechanical pain sensitivity differed significantly between the two groups, suggesting that cupping has an influence on functional pain processing.
The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01289964).
本初步试验旨在研究拔罐这一治疗疼痛综合征的古老方法对慢性非特异性颈痛患者的影响。评估了感觉机械阈值和参与者的疼痛和生活质量自我报告的结果测量。
50 名患者(50.5 ± 11.9 岁)随机分为治疗组(TG)或等待名单对照组(WL)。TG 组接受了为期 2 周的 5 次拔罐治疗;对照组则没有。拔罐系列前后的自我报告结果测量包括以下内容:100mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的静息疼痛(PR)和最大运动相关疼痛(PM)、疼痛日记(PD)0-10 数字评分量表(NRS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和健康相关生活质量(SF-36)。此外,还在相关和对照区域确定了机械检测阈值(MDT)、振动检测阈值(VDT)和压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。
与 WL 组相比,TG 组患者在拔罐治疗后疼痛明显减轻(PR:Δ-22.5mm,p = 0.00002;PM:Δ-17.8mm,p = 0.01)。疼痛日记(PD)显示,TG 患者的颈部疼痛逐渐减轻,并且两组在第五次拔罐后报告的疼痛差异显著(Δ-1.1,p = 0.001)。SF-36 子量表中的身体疼痛(Δ13.8,p = 0.006)和活力(Δ10.2,p = 0.006)也有显著差异。相关和对照区域的 PPT 组间差异具有统计学意义(均 p < 0.05),但 MDT 或 VDT 差异无统计学意义。
一系列五次拔罐治疗似乎对缓解慢性非特异性颈痛有效。不仅主观测量得到改善,而且两组之间的机械疼痛敏感性也有显著差异,这表明拔罐对功能性疼痛处理有影响。
该试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT01289964)。