Paloheimo M P, Wilson R C, Edmonds H L, Lucas L F, Triantafillou A N
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, School of Medicine, KY 40292.
J Clin Monit. 1988 Oct;4(4):256-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01617322.
Facial and hand muscles are used frequently for monitoring neuromuscular blockade. Therefore, we compared changes in electrically evoked muscle potential magnitude in upper facial and hypothenar muscles after fixed doses of neuromuscular blockers (succinylcholine, 750 micrograms/kg; pancuronium, 70 micrograms/kg; vecuronium, 50 micrograms/kg; and atracurium, 300 micrograms/kg). Face-hand comparisons were made in both anesthetized (nitrous oxide/narcotic, n = 51) and comatose (closed-head injuries, n = 5) patients. In 24 anesthetized patients, complete blockade of the hypothenar muscles prevented quantitative comparison. In the remaining 27 patients, the relaxant effect (as determined by the percentage change from prerelaxant baseline muscle potentials) was significantly smaller (P less than 0.0001) in the upper facial muscles (65 +/- 24% versus 92 +/- 8%, mean +/- SD). All four evoked muscle responses to train-of-four stimulation were detectable in upper facial muscles of the 19 patients receiving non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs; this pattern was seen in hand muscles of only 7 patients (P less than 0.001). The neuromuscular blockade in both the hand (49 +/- 54%) and the upper facial area (68 +/- 28%, P greater than 0.05) of comatose patients was smaller and more variable than that seen during anesthesia. These results illustrate the value of quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular function, especially during highly variable and unpredictable drug-induced blockade in the comatose state. We conclude that during narcotic-based anesthesia the upper facial and hand muscles are differentially sensitive to commonly used neuromuscular blockers.
面部和手部肌肉常用于监测神经肌肉阻滞。因此,我们比较了固定剂量神经肌肉阻滞剂(琥珀酰胆碱,750微克/千克;泮库溴铵,70微克/千克;维库溴铵,50微克/千克;阿曲库铵,300微克/千克)后,面部上半部分肌肉和小鱼际肌电诱发肌肉电位幅度的变化。在麻醉患者(氧化亚氮/麻醉剂,n = 51)和昏迷患者(闭合性颅脑损伤,n = 5)中进行了面部与手部的比较。在24例麻醉患者中,小鱼际肌完全阻滞妨碍了定量比较。在其余27例患者中,上半部分面部肌肉的松弛效果(根据松弛前基线肌肉电位的百分比变化确定)明显较小(P < 0.0001)(65±24% 对 92±8%,平均值±标准差)。在接受非去极化神经肌肉阻滞药物的19例患者的上半部分面部肌肉中,对四个成串刺激的所有四种诱发肌肉反应均能检测到;仅在7例患者的手部肌肉中观察到这种模式(P < 0.001)。昏迷患者手部(49±54%)和上半部分面部区域(68±28%,P > 0.05)的神经肌肉阻滞比麻醉期间更小且更具变异性。这些结果说明了神经肌肉功能定量监测的价值,尤其是在昏迷状态下药物诱导的高度可变且不可预测的阻滞期间。我们得出结论,在基于麻醉剂的麻醉期间,上半部分面部肌肉和手部肌肉对常用神经肌肉阻滞剂的敏感性不同。