Suppr超能文献

3.0T 磁共振化学交换饱和传递成像在肺癌脑转移中的初步应用。

Preliminary application of 3.0 T magnetic resonance chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging in brain metastasis of lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China.

Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0400-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer brain metastases are very common and one of the common causes of treatment failure. We aimed to examine the clinical use of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) technology in the evaluation of brain metastases for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

METHODS

We included26 cases of lung cancer brain metastases, 15 cases of gliomas, and 20 cases with normal tests. The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR;3.5 ppm) image from the GRE-EPI-CEST sequence was analyzed using the ASSET technique and APT technology. The MTR values were measured in the lesion-parenchymal, edema, and non-focus regions, and the MTR image was compared with the conventional MRI. ANOVA and t-test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The lesion-parenchymal, edema, and non-focus areas in the metastatic-tumor-group were red-yellow, yellow-green, and green-blue, and the MTR values were 3.29 ± 1.14%,1.28 ± 0.36%,and 1.26 ± 0.31%, respectively. However, in the glioma-group, the corresponding areas were red, red-yellow, and green-blue, and the MTR values were 6.29 ± 1.58%, 2.87 ± 0.65%, and 1.03 ± 0.30%, respectively. The MTR values of the corresponding areas in the normal-group were 1.07 ± 0.22%,1.04 ± 0.23%, and 1.06 ± 0.24%, respectively. Traditional MR images are in black-white contrast and no metabolic information is displayed. The MTRvalues of the three regions were significantly different among the three groups. The values were also significantly different between the parenchymal and edema areas in the metastatic-tumor-group. There were significant differences in the MTR values between the non-lesion and edema regions, but there was no significant difference between the edema and non-focus areas. In the glioma-group, there were significant differences in the MTR values between the parenchymal and edema areas, between the parenchymal and non-focus areas, and between the edema and non-focus areas.

CONCLUSIONS

CEST reflects the protein metabolism; therefore, early diagnosis of brain metastases and assessment of the prognosis can be achieved using molecular imaging.

摘要

背景

肺癌脑转移非常常见,也是治疗失败的常见原因之一。我们旨在探讨化学交换饱和转移(CEST)技术在评估肺癌脑转移中的临床应用,以用于肺癌的诊断和预后。

方法

纳入 26 例肺癌脑转移患者、15 例胶质瘤患者和 20 例正常检查患者。采用 ASSET 技术和 APT 技术对 GRE-EPI-CEST 序列的磁化转移率(MTR;3.5 ppm)图像进行分析。在病变实质、水肿和非焦点区域测量 MTR 值,并将 MTR 图像与常规 MRI 进行比较。采用方差分析和 t 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

转移瘤组病变实质、水肿和非焦点区域的 MTR 值分别为 3.29±1.14%、1.28±0.36%和 1.26±0.31%,表现为红黄、黄绿和绿蓝,而胶质瘤组相应区域的 MTR 值分别为 6.29±1.58%、2.87±0.65%和 1.03±0.30%,表现为红、红黄和绿蓝。正常组相应区域的 MTR 值分别为 1.07±0.22%、1.04±0.23%和 1.06±0.24%,表现为黑白对比,无代谢信息显示。三组间各区域 MTR 值差异均有统计学意义,转移瘤组实质与水肿区 MTR 值亦有统计学差异,非病灶区与水肿区 MTR 值有统计学差异,但水肿区与非焦点区 MTR 值无统计学差异。胶质瘤组实质与水肿区、实质与非焦点区、水肿与非焦点区 MTR 值差异均有统计学意义。

结论

CEST 反映蛋白质代谢,因此可以通过分子成像实现脑转移的早期诊断和预后评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2332/6958938/ead128779a47/12880_2019_400_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验