• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个将公众参与(PI)全面纳入患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的新兴框架。

An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

作者信息

Carlton J, Peasgood T, Khan S, Barber R, Bostock J, Keetharuth A D

机构信息

University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 13;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8
PMID:31933005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6957651/
Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally to report and monitor patients' subjective assessments of their symptoms and functional status and also their quality of life. Whilst the importance of involving the public in PROM development to increase the quality of the developed PROM has been highlighted this practice is not widespread. There is a lack of guidance on how public involvement (PI) could be embedded in the development of PROMs, where the roles can be more complex than in other types of research. This paper provides a timely review and sets out an emerging framework for fully incorporating PI into PROM development.

摘要

患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)在英国及国际上被广泛用于报告和监测患者对其症状、功能状态以及生活质量的主观评估。虽然让公众参与PROMs的开发以提高所开发PROMs的质量的重要性已得到强调,但这种做法并不普遍。关于如何将公众参与(PI)纳入PROMs的开发,缺乏相关指导,因为在PROMs开发中,相关角色可能比其他类型的研究更为复杂。本文及时进行了综述,并提出了一个将PI全面纳入PROMs开发的新框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2038/6957651/4aadd34afbff/41687_2019_172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2038/6957651/4aadd34afbff/41687_2019_172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2038/6957651/4aadd34afbff/41687_2019_172_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).一个将公众参与(PI)全面纳入患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的新兴框架。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 13;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8.
2
Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.患者参与患者报告结局指标的制定:一项范围综述
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/hex.12442. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview.患者报告的结局指标:概述
Br J Community Nurs. 2011 Mar;16(3):146-51. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.3.146.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment.成人慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价和质量评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1532-1540.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.012.
5
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A systematic review.成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的测量特性:系统评价。
Sleep Med Rev. 2016 Aug;28:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: a systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.评估间歇性跛行患者报告结局测量工具的质量:使用 COSMIN 清单的系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):316-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability.髋部骨折老年人的患者报告结局指标:质量与可接受性的系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):799-812. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1424-1. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
Patient-reported outcome measures which assess body image in urogynaecology patients: a systematic review.评估泌尿妇科患者身体形象的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):673-681. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03924-x. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
Evaluating cancer patient-reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use.评估癌症患者报告的结局测量指标:可读性及其对临床应用的影响。
Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;125(8):1350-1356. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31928. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, patterns of multimorbidity, and its correlations with health-related quality of life in rural southwest China: a cross-sectional study.中国西南部农村地区的患病率、多重疾病模式及其与健康相关生活质量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 21;12:1609831. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1609831. eCollection 2025.
2
Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies from the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.推进全球癌症症状科学:首届癌症症状科学专家会议的见解与策略
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug;41(4):151905. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151905. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
3
Exploring the social experiences, stigma and discrimination, faced by women with gestational diabetes: A collaborative qualitative study and item-pool development.

本文引用的文献

1
PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review.患者报告结局测量数据:能否用于为个体患者做出决策?一项叙述性综述。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156291. eCollection 2019.
2
Effective involvement: a report on the evaluation of a research awareness training package for public involvement in health research.有效参与:关于公众参与健康研究的研究意识培训包评估报告
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jun 13;5:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0151-5. eCollection 2019.
3
Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures.
探索妊娠期糖尿病女性所面临的社会经历、耻辱感和歧视:一项合作性定性研究及条目池开发
Diabet Med. 2025 Aug;42(8):e70073. doi: 10.1111/dme.70073. Epub 2025 May 23.
4
Measuring what really matters: Why developing patient-reported outcome measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy should involve patients and caregivers.衡量真正重要的东西:为何在杜氏肌营养不良症中开发患者报告的结局指标应让患者和护理人员参与其中。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Jul;67(7):832-833. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16225. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
5
Supporting the continuous development and use of a patient partnership framework in European rare disease networks (ERNs): a scoping review of frameworks in the scientific literature.支持欧洲罕见病网络(ERNs)中患者伙伴关系框架的持续发展与应用:对科学文献中框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2025 Feb;16(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00763-2. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
6
Correlations among nicotine dependence, health-related quality of life, and depression in current smokers: a cross-sectional study with a mediation model.当前吸烟者的尼古丁依赖、健康相关生活质量与抑郁之间的相关性:一项采用中介模型的横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 27;15:1455918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1455918. eCollection 2024.
7
Development of a novel patient reported outcome measure for health-related quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PROQuALS): study protocol.开发一种用于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(PROQuALS)患者健康相关生活质量的新型报告结局测量工具(PROQuALS):研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 30;22(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02286-3.
8
Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review.了解影响患者报告结局测量在常规临床实践中整合的因素:伞式综述。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2611-2629. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
9
Development of a new health-related quality of life measure for people with diabetes who experience hypoglycaemia: the Hypo-RESOLVE QoL.开发一种新的与健康相关的生活质量衡量标准,用于经历低血糖的糖尿病患者:Hypo-RESOLVE QoL。
Diabetologia. 2024 Aug;67(8):1536-1551. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06182-9. Epub 2024 May 22.
10
The "most bothersome symptom" construct: A qualitative study of Australians living with endometriosis.“最困扰症状”构建:对澳大利亚子宫内膜异位症患者的定性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1625-1633. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14876. Epub 2024 May 15.
公众参与健康结局研究:从恢复生活质量(ReQoL)措施的制定中汲取的经验教训。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1123-z.
4
Involving patients and the public in medical and health care research studies: An exploratory survey on participant recruiting and representativeness from the perspective of study authors.参与医疗保健研究:从研究作者的角度出发,对参与者招募和代表性的探索性调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0204187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204187. eCollection 2019.
5
Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: Practical recommendations for researchers.让青年参与研究规划、设计和执行:研究人员的实用建议。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):944-949. doi: 10.1111/hex.12795. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL).内容和表面有效性在工具开发中的重要性:从服务使用者在开发“恢复生活质量量表”(ReQoL)时吸取的经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1893-1902. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)健康与社会护理研究设计阶段的公众参与框架:制定具有道德意识的标准的时候到了。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 4;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y. eCollection 2017.
8
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress.一个用于有意义且灵活参与临床试验的患者和公众参与(PPI)工具包——正在进行中的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
9
Combining PPI with qualitative research to engage 'harder-to-reach' populations: service user groups as co-applicants on a platform study for a trial.将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与定性研究相结合以接触“更难接触到”的人群:服务用户群体作为平台研究试验的共同申请人
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0023-1. eCollection 2016.
10
Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: The developers' perspective.患者参与患者报告结局指标的制定:开发者视角
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2582-8.