Mohaqeqi Kamal Seyed Hossein, Ghaedamini Harouni Gholamreza, Basakha Mehdi
Social Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Social Welfare Management Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Oct 19;33:112. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.112. eCollection 2019.
Human well-being is a core global issue. Thus, achieving and sustaining higher levels of well-being is a challenge for citizens, governments, and international organizations worldwide. The present study aimed at describing the well-being status of residents of Tehran municipal districts. To achieve this, a composite well-being index was constructed for 22 municipal districts of Tehran (Tehran Well-being Index; TWI). This cross sectional study was conducted from May to October 2017 in Tehran using the data collected in the second round of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART) Project of Tehran (2012-2013). The statistical population of this study was 22 municipal districts of Tehran and a sample of 34 700 households (118 000 individuals) selected using multistage cluster sampling. TWI was developed through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) methodology of constructing composite indicators. Then, 22 municipal districts were categorized based on TWI scores. All data were analyzed using SPSS v.18. In addition, a cartogram was applied using GIS software to classify well-being status among Tehran municipal districts. Factor analysis results showed that the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was 0.691 and 2 factors (material well-being and psychological well-being) explained 74.13% of the total variances. Furthermore, the best and worst performances were found in districts 6 and 17, respectively. District 6 had the best and district 17 the worst material well-being status. Also, districts 6 and 19 had the best and worst psychological well-being status, respectively. In general, the well-being status of the municipal districts of Tehran can be divided into 5 main categories: (a) prosperous (districts 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6); (b) fairly prosperous (districts 4, 21, and 22); (C) moderately prosperous (districts 7, 8, and 13); (d) less prosperous (9, 10, 11, 14, and 12); and (e) deprived zone (districts 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19).
人类福祉是一个核心的全球性问题。因此，实现并维持更高水平的福祉对全球各地的公民、政府和国际组织而言都是一项挑战。本研究旨在描述德黑兰市辖区居民的福祉状况。为实现这一目标，构建了一个针对德黑兰22个市辖区的综合福祉指数（德黑兰福祉指数；TWI）。这项横断面研究于2017年5月至10月在德黑兰进行，使用了德黑兰第二轮城市健康公平评估与应对工具（Urban HEART）项目（2012 - 2013年）收集的数据。本研究的统计总体为德黑兰的22个市辖区，通过多阶段整群抽样选取了34700户家庭（118000人）作为样本。TWI是通过经济合作与发展组织（OECD）构建综合指标的方法开发的。然后，根据TWI得分对22个市辖区进行分类。所有数据均使用SPSS v.18进行分析。此外，使用GIS软件绘制了专题地图，以对德黑兰市辖区的福祉状况进行分类。因子分析结果显示，Kaiser - Meyer - Olkin（KMO）值为0.691，两个因子（物质福祉和心理福祉）解释了总方差的74.13%。此外，分别在第6区和第17区发现了最佳和最差表现。第6区物质福祉状况最佳，第17区最差。同样，第6区和第19区心理福祉状况分别最佳和最差。总体而言，德黑兰市辖区的福祉状况可分为5个主要类别：（a）繁荣（第1、2、3、5和6区）；（b）较为繁荣（第4、21和22区）；（c）中等繁荣（第7、8和13区）；（d）不太繁荣（第9、10、11、14和12区）；以及（e）贫困区（第12、15、16、17、18和19区）。
