Wauters Lisa, Marquardt Thomas, Muñoz Maria L
University of Texas at Austin, United States.
University of Texas at Austin, United States.
J Commun Disord. 2020 March-April;84:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105971. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
This study investigated differences between healthy bilingual participants and bilingual participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) on verbal fluency tasks. The performance of three Spanish-English bilingual speakers with traumatic brain injury was compared to the performance of 30 neurotypical bilingual speakers on tasks of category and letter verbal fluency in English and Spanish. Responses were analyzed for total number of correct productions, differences in correct productions between languages, average cluster size, total number of switches, and rates of language choice errors. The data were analyzed using predicted scores from regression equations based on neurotypical data and modified t-tests. Analyses revealed significantly lower total output than predicted by the regression equations for both task types and in both languages for one TBI participant. The same participant demonstrated significantly lower total number of switches than the neurotypical group. Two participants demonstrated higher rates of language choice errors than the neurotypical group. There were no significant differences between TBI participants and the neurotypical group for average cluster size. There were no significant differences between predicted and obtained values for differences between English and Spanish total number correct in each task type. Results are discussed in the context of individual cognitive and linguistic profiles of the TBI participants.
本研究调查了健康的双语参与者与患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的双语参与者在语言流畅性任务上的差异。将三名患有创伤性脑损伤的西班牙语-英语双语者的表现与30名神经典型双语者在英语和西班牙语的类别及字母语言流畅性任务上的表现进行了比较。对回答的正确产出总数、不同语言间正确产出的差异、平均聚类大小、转换总数以及语言选择错误率进行了分析。使用基于神经典型数据的回归方程预测分数和修正t检验对数据进行了分析。分析显示,一名TBI参与者在两种任务类型和两种语言中的总产出均显著低于回归方程的预测值。该参与者的转换总数也显著低于神经典型组。两名参与者的语言选择错误率高于神经典型组。TBI参与者与神经典型组在平均聚类大小上没有显著差异。在每种任务类型中,英语和西班牙语正确总数之间的差异的预测值与实际值没有显著差异。研究结果结合TBI参与者的个体认知和语言特征进行了讨论。