• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

REACH 和职业安全健康法规的暴露模型。

Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.

机构信息

Centre for Human Exposure Science, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.

Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020383.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17020383
PMID:31936022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7013818/
Abstract

Model tools for estimating hazardous substance exposure are an accepted part of regulatory risk assessments in Europe, and models underpin control banding tools used to help manage chemicals in workplaces. Of necessity the models are simplified abstractions of real-life working situations that aim to capture the essence of the scenario to give estimates of actual exposures with an appropriate margin of safety. The basis for existing inhalation exposure assessment tools has recently been discussed by some scientists who have argued for the use of more complex models. In our opinion, the currently accepted tools are documented to be the most robust way for workplace health and safety practitioners and others to estimate inhalation exposure. However, we recognise that it is important to continue the scientific development of exposure modelling to further elaborate and improve the existing methodologies.

摘要

用于估算有害物质暴露的模型工具是欧洲监管风险评估的公认组成部分,模型也是用于帮助管理工作场所化学品的控制带工具的基础。这些模型必然是对现实工作情况的简化抽象,旨在捕捉场景的本质,以给出具有适当安全裕度的实际暴露估计。最近,一些科学家讨论了现有吸入暴露评估工具的基础,他们主张使用更复杂的模型。在我们看来,目前被接受的工具被证明是工作场所健康和安全从业者以及其他人估算吸入暴露的最可靠方法。然而,我们认识到继续进行暴露建模的科学发展以进一步阐述和改进现有方法学非常重要。

相似文献

1
Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.REACH 和职业安全健康法规的暴露模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020383.
2
[Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].[用于评估化学物质职业暴露的预测模型:雇主面临的新挑战]
Med Pr. 2013;64(5):699-716. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.2013.0058.
3
Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study.评估 REACH 法规的风险评估方法:案例研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Jan 7;63(1):68-76. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy090.
4
Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Tools under REACH: Part II-Higher Tier Tools.REACH 下暴露评估工具的评估:第二部分-高级工具。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Feb 16;63(2):230-241. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy098.
5
Evaluation of recommended REACH exposure modeling tools and near-field, far-field model in assessing occupational exposure to toluene from spray paint.评估推荐的化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)暴露建模工具以及近场、远场模型在评估喷漆作业中职业接触甲苯的情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Mar;57(2):210-20. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes062. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
A Study of the Validity of Two Exposure Assessment Tools: Stoffenmanager and the Advanced REACH Tool.两种暴露评估工具的有效性研究:Stoffenmanager 和先进的 REACH 工具。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Jun 1;61(5):575-588. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx008.
7
Evaluation of Stoffenmanager® and ART for Estimating Occupational Inhalation Exposures to Volatile Liquids.评估 Stoffenmanager® 和 ART 估算挥发性液体职业吸入暴露的方法。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Mar 15;67(3):402-413. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac091.
8
Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.Stoffenmanager暴露模型:一种定量算法的开发
Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Aug;52(6):443-54. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men033. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
9
Validation of Lower Tier Exposure Tools Used for REACH: Comparison of Tools Estimates With Available Exposure Measurements.用于 REACH 的低级别暴露工具的验证:工具估计值与现有暴露测量值的比较。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Oct 1;61(8):921-938. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx056.
10
Recommendation of occupational exposure limits (2014-2015).职业接触限值建议(2014 - 2015年)
J Occup Health. 2014;56(5):401-20. doi: 10.1539/joh.roel.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational hygiene risk assessment at light speed-a study for protecting worker health and safety in the biopharmaceutical industry.光速下的职业卫生风险评估——一项保护生物制药行业工人健康与安全的研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 25;13:1559588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559588. eCollection 2025.
2
Evidence-based dust exposure prediction and/or control tools in occupational settings: A scoping review protocol.循证职业环境粉尘暴露预测和/或控制工具:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0309967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309967. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing the impact of authorisation process as a regulatory tool in the European REACH regulation: A study on improving occupational safety for applying companies.评估授权程序作为欧洲 REACH 法规监管工具的影响:一项关于改善申请公司职业安全的研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):617-625. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae032.
4
Occupational inhalation exposure during surface disinfection-exposure assessment based on exposure models compared with measurement data.职业性吸入暴露于表面消毒过程中——基于暴露模型的暴露评估与测量数据的比较。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;34(2):345-355. doi: 10.1038/s41370-023-00633-y. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
5
Characterizing the Contribution of Indoor Residential Phthalate and Phthalate Alternative Dust Concentrations to Internal Dose in the US General Population: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.表征美国一般人群室内住宅邻苯二甲酸酯和邻苯二甲酸酯替代物灰尘浓度对体内剂量的贡献:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;20(16):6589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166589.
6
Review of generic scenario environmental release and occupational exposure models used in chemical risk assessment.用于化学风险评估的一般情景环境释放和职业暴露模型综述。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Nov;20(11):545-562. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2242896. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
How Valuable Are Small Measurement Datasets in Supplementing Occupational Exposure Models? A Numerical Study Using the Advanced Reach Tool.小测量数据集在补充职业暴露模型方面有多大价值?使用高级接触工具的数值研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;20(7):5386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075386.
8
Theoretical Background of Occupational-Exposure Models-Report of an Expert Workshop of the ISES Europe Working Group "Exposure Models".职业暴露模型的理论背景——ISES 欧洲工作组“暴露模型”专家研讨会报告。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031234.
9
A Strategy for Field Evaluations of Exposures and Respiratory Health of Workers at Small- to Medium-Sized Coffee Facilities.中小咖啡设施中工人暴露与呼吸健康的现场评估策略。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;9:705225. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.705225. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluating the Theoretical Background of STOFFENMANAGER® and the Advanced REACH Tool.评估 STOFFENMANAGER® 和高级 REACH 工具的理论基础。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Apr 22;66(4):520-536. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab057.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.如何获得可靠的职业暴露估计?模型可靠性的回顾与讨论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 2;16(15):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152764.
2
Indoor dispersion of airborne nano and fine particles: Main factors affecting spatial and temporal distribution in the frame of exposure modeling.室内空气传播纳米和细颗粒物的扩散:暴露建模框架中影响时空分布的主要因素。
Indoor Air. 2019 Sep;29(5):803-816. doi: 10.1111/ina.12579. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
Modeling of High Nanoparticle Exposure in an Indoor Industrial Scenario with a One-Box Model.采用单箱模型对室内工业场景中的高纳米颗粒暴露进行建模。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 14;16(10):1695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101695.
4
Source specific exposure and risk assessment for indoor aerosols.室内气溶胶的特定来源暴露和风险评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.398. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Testing the performance of one and two box models as tools for risk assessment of particle exposure during packing of inorganic fertilizer.测试一个和两个盒子模型在评估包装无机肥料过程中颗粒暴露风险的性能。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2423-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.379. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
The general ventilation multipliers calculated by using a standard Near-Field/Far-Field model.使用标准近场/远场模型计算的一般通风乘数。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 May;15(5):D38-D43. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1440084.
7
Validation of Lower Tier Exposure Tools Used for REACH: Comparison of Tools Estimates With Available Exposure Measurements.用于 REACH 的低级别暴露工具的验证:工具估计值与现有暴露测量值的比较。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Oct 1;61(8):921-938. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx056.
8
Interzonal airflow rates for use in near-field far-field workplace concentration modeling.用于近场-远场工作场所浓度建模的区域间气流速率。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Oct;14(10):793-800. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1334903.
9
An Intervention Study on the Implementation of Control Banding in Controlling Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.一项关于在中小企业中实施控制带以控制危险化学品暴露的干预研究。
Saf Health Work. 2016 Sep;7(3):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals by air sampling for comparison with limit values: the influence of sampling strategy.通过空气采样评估化学物质的职业暴露以与限值进行比较:采样策略的影响。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 May;58(4):437-49. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met084. Epub 2014 Jan 29.