• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估授权程序作为欧洲 REACH 法规监管工具的影响:一项关于改善申请公司职业安全的研究。

Assessing the impact of authorisation process as a regulatory tool in the European REACH regulation: A study on improving occupational safety for applying companies.

机构信息

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1-25, 44149 Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):617-625. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae032.

DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxae032
PMID:38718166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229307/
Abstract

This study looks into the effectiveness of the authorisation procedure as a regulatory instrument within the framework of the European REACH regulation. It highlights its impact on enhancing occupational safety and health for both applicants and companies utilising the substances. This procedure encompasses manufacturers, importers, and downstream users of substances, as well as representatives of foreign manufacturers who are also eligible to seek authorisation. When applying for authorisation, the ECHA Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) assesses the risks associated with the intended uses of the substance, including the appropriateness and effectiveness of the Occupational Conditions (OCs) and Risk Management Measures (RMMs) described in the application and the risks posed by potential alternatives. If the RAC determines that the OCs/RMMs are inadequate for managing or controlling the risk, or if the measures to protect workers are deemed insufficient, it may recommend additional measures to enhance occupational safety and health or environmental protection. The 398 processed Applications for Authorisation (AfA) that have been submitted to date were examined to determine these recommended measures, categorised as Conditions for use, Monitoring arrangements, and Recommendations for Review Reports. Overall, a significant improvement concerning occupational safety and health seems necessary, as indicated by the large number of measures recommended by the ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and ECHA Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC) or supplemented by the European Commission. In addition to the proposed measures, a short assessment provided by the committees as to whether the operational conditions and risk management measures are adequate in controlling the risks is also included in the study.

摘要

本研究探讨了授权程序作为欧洲 REACH 法规框架内的监管工具的有效性。它强调了其对提高申请人和使用物质的公司的职业安全和健康的影响。该程序涵盖了制造商、进口商和物质的下游用户,以及有资格寻求授权的外国制造商的代表。在申请授权时,欧洲化学品管理局风险评估委员会(RAC)评估与物质预期用途相关的风险,包括申请中描述的职业条件(OCs)和风险管理措施(RMMs)的适当性和有效性,以及潜在替代品带来的风险。如果 RAC 确定 OCs/RMMs 不足以管理或控制风险,或者保护工人的措施被认为不足够,它可能会建议采取额外措施来加强职业安全和健康或环境保护。迄今为止,已审查了提交的 398 份授权申请(AfA),以确定这些建议措施,这些措施分为使用条件、监测安排和审查报告建议。总体而言,正如欧洲化学品管理局风险评估委员会(RAC)和社会经济分析委员会(SEAC)或欧洲委员会补充的大量措施所表明的那样,职业安全和健康似乎需要显著改善。除了拟议措施外,委员会还对控制风险的操作条件和风险管理措施是否足够进行了简短评估,并将其包含在研究中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/dc1383f9cb30/wxae032_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/b781e109c2f4/wxae032_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/4756c8fac36e/wxae032_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/618a3b143874/wxae032_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/dc1383f9cb30/wxae032_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/b781e109c2f4/wxae032_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/4756c8fac36e/wxae032_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/618a3b143874/wxae032_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5460/11229307/dc1383f9cb30/wxae032_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of authorisation process as a regulatory tool in the European REACH regulation: A study on improving occupational safety for applying companies.评估授权程序作为欧洲 REACH 法规监管工具的影响:一项关于改善申请公司职业安全的研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):617-625. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae032.
2
Olefins and chemical regulation in Europe: REACH.烯烃和欧洲的化学法规:REACH。
Chem Biol Interact. 2015 Nov 5;241:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
3
Exposure scenarios for workers.工人的暴露场景。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 1:S16-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500617. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
4
Trade Union Priority List for REACH authorisation.行业工会优先关注 REACH 授权事宜。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jan;65(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090811. Epub 2010 May 27.
5
Environmental Risk Assessment of Technical Mixtures Under the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals-A Regulatory Perspective.技术混合物的环境风险评估在欧洲化学品注册、评估、授权和限制制度下——监管视角。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 May;17(3):498-506. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4393. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
[Regulations for the protection of workers against the effects of hazardous substances at the workplace].[保护工人免受工作场所有害物质影响的规定]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Mar;51(3):266-73. doi: 10.1007/s00103-008-0456-2.
7
Generic exposure scenarios: their development, application, and interpretation under REACH.通用暴露场景:在《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)下的制定、应用及解读
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):451-64. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer022. Epub 2011 May 6.
8
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
9
A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.一项针对瑞典工作场所化学风险管理人员对职业接触限值和 REACH 衍生无效应水平的态度的范围调查。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):611-620. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01493. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
The German REACH Congress 2016: a workshop report.德国 REACH 大会 2016:研讨会报告。
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Mar;92(3):1343-1347. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2175-2. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges to estimating and managing risks with hexavalent chromium exposure: a mixed-methods study of Swedish workplaces.六价铬暴露风险评估与管理面临的挑战:瑞典工作场所的混合方法研究
Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Aug 1;69(7):722-735. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf039.

本文引用的文献

1
Interaction of the EU Chemicals Regulation-REACH-with Occupational Safety and Health Legislation: A Report from the 5th German REACH Congress.《欧盟化学品法规-REACH 与职业安全健康法规的交互作用:第五届德国 REACH 大会报告》。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Jul 2;66(6):687-697. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac014.
2
Biomonitoring as an Underused Exposure Assessment Tool in Occupational Safety and Health Context-Challenges and Way Forward.生物监测在职业安全与健康背景下作为一种未充分利用的暴露评估工具——挑战与未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165884.
3
Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.
REACH 和职业安全健康法规的暴露模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020383.