Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois.
J Endourol. 2020 Mar;34(3):373-378. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0706.
Forniceal rupture due to obstructing ureterolithiasis (FROU) is a seldom encountered radiographic finding, but the impact of this diagnosis and influence on stone management has not been well studied in the literature. The purpose of the study is to examine stone characteristics and intervention patterns of patients with radiographic evidence of FROU. A retrospective analysis of all patients with radiographic evidence of FROU was compared with patients with obstructing ureteral stones without forniceal ruptures (noFROU). All patients presented to our Emergency Department from January 2015 until December 2018. Data analyzed included patient demographics, clinical presentation, stone characteristics, and management pattern. Primary outcome was need for hospital admission and surgical intervention. Thirty-two patients with FROU (mean age = 45) were compared with 50 patients with noFROU (mean age = 57). Univariate analysis revealed that age, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension, days of symptoms, degree of hydronephrosis, and degree of perinephric stranding were associated with forniceal rupture ( ≤ 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only degree of perinephric stranding remained significant ( ≤ 0.05). Average maximum axial stone diameter in the FROU group was 5.1 mm 4.7 mm in the noFROU group ( = 0.66). Overall, 68.8% of stones were located within the distal ureter in the FROU group 48.8% in the noFROU group ( = 0.09). There was no difference in hospital admission (FROU 37.5% noFROU 44%, = 0.56) and need for surgical intervention (FROU 50% noFROU 48%, = 0.86). There were no 30-day complications in patients with FROU. Ureteral stone location and size does not seem to impact the presence of FROU. FROU may be an alarming reported finding but its presence does not appear to impact clinical outcomes or affect urological management, including admission or need for urologic intervention.
由于输尿管结石梗阻导致的穹窿破裂(FROU)是一种少见的影像学表现,但该诊断的影响以及对结石处理的影响在文献中尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的目的是检查有影像学证据的 FROU 患者的结石特征和干预模式。对所有有影像学证据的 FROU 患者进行回顾性分析,并与无穹窿破裂的梗阻性输尿管结石患者(无 FROU)进行比较。所有患者均于 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在我院急诊科就诊。分析的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、临床表现、结石特征和处理模式。主要结局是需要住院和手术干预。32 例 FROU 患者(平均年龄 45 岁)与 50 例无 FROU 患者(平均年龄 57 岁)进行比较。单因素分析显示,年龄、糖尿病史、高血压史、症状天数、肾积水程度和肾周条纹程度与穹窿破裂有关(≤0.05)。多因素分析显示,只有肾周条纹程度有统计学意义(≤0.05)。FROU 组的平均最大轴向结石直径为 5.1mm,无 FROU 组为 4.7mm(=0.66)。总的来说,FROU 组的结石有 68.8%位于输尿管下段,无 FROU 组为 48.8%(=0.09)。FROU 组的住院率(37.5%对 44%,=0.56)和手术干预率(50%对 48%,=0.86)无差异。FROU 组无 30 天并发症。输尿管结石的位置和大小似乎并不影响 FROU 的存在。FROU 可能是一个令人担忧的报告发现,但它的存在似乎不会影响临床结果或影响泌尿外科管理,包括住院或需要泌尿外科干预。