Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Jun;51(3):427-441. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00954-w.
A considerable number of children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder (SAD) do not benefit from treatment as much as expected. However, treatment success should not be measured with social anxiety reports alone; the cognitive, behavioral, and physiological components of social stress should also be assessed. The authors examined an exposure-based SAD-specific group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized controlled trial (N = 67, age 9-13 years, blind randomized allocation to treatment [CBT; n = 31] and waitlist control [WLC; n = 36] groups). Success was operationalized as a clinically significant reduction of symptoms measured with SAD-specific questionnaires, structured interviews, and changes in response to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). In the CBT group, there was a trend toward a significant increase in positive cognitions in the TSST after treatment (d = 0.37), whereas these positive cognitions decreased in the WLC group (d = 0.40). No significant results involving group appeared for negative cognitions, behavior and physiology. Children in the CBT group, but not parents, further reported less social anxiety in one questionnaire from pre- to post-treatment (d = 0.89). A structured interview confirmed a decrease in severity of SAD in the CBT group. While the gold standard of a blind interview showed efficacy of treatment, not all trait and state measures demonstrated similar success patterns.Trial registration Eligibility criteria and some of the dependent variables (cognitions, physiology) for treatment success were registered with the German Research Foundation (TU 78/5-2, HE 3342/4-2) prior to recruitment. Clinical assessment of diagnosis and behavioral data were not a priori planned as outcome measures for this trial and therefore analyzed in a post-hoc approach.
相当数量的患有社交焦虑症(SAD)的儿童和青少年并没有像预期的那样从治疗中获益。然而,治疗成功不应仅通过社交焦虑报告来衡量;还应评估认知、行为和生理方面的社交压力。作者在一项随机对照试验(N=67,年龄 9-13 岁,盲法随机分配至治疗(CBT;n=31)和等待名单对照(WLC;n=36)组)中检查了一种基于暴露的特定于社交焦虑症的团体认知行为疗法(CBT)。成功的操作定义为使用特定于 SAD 的问卷、结构化访谈和对特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)的反应变化来衡量症状的临床显著减轻。在 CBT 组中,治疗后 TSST 中的积极认知有增加的趋势(d=0.37),而 WLC 组中的这些积极认知则减少(d=0.40)。对于消极认知、行为和生理,没有出现涉及组的显著结果。CBT 组的儿童(但不是父母)进一步报告在一项从治疗前到治疗后的问卷中社交焦虑程度较低(d=0.89)。结构化访谈证实 CBT 组的 SAD 严重程度降低。虽然盲法访谈是金标准,但并非所有特质和状态测量都显示出类似的成功模式。
在招募前,治疗成功的资格标准和一些因变量(认知、生理)已在德国研究基金会(TU 78/5-2,HE 3342/4-2)注册。临床诊断和行为数据的评估不是本试验的预设结果测量指标,因此采用了事后分析方法。