Vilchez-Cavazos Felix, Dávila-Martínez Agustín, Garza-Castro Santiago de la, Simental-Mendía Mario, Garay-Mendoza Domingo, Tamez-Mata Yadira, Peña-Martínez Victor, Acosta-Olivo Carlos
Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo Léon, México.
Cir Cir. 2020;88(1):76-81. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.19001001.
One of the most common grafts used to repair anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. However, another proposed option to repair the ACL is the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft. This study aimed to compare the pain and clinical results between patients with ACL injury treated with QT autograft and with HT autograft.
The Ethics and Investigation Committee of our institution approved the study. The patients were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with QT autograft and the other group was treated with HT autograft. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Lysholm-Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, and visual analog scale (VAS), at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
A total of 28 patients with a primary ACL injury were included in the study. No significant differences in VAS pain, Lysholm knee and Tegner activity scale scores, and IKDC score between the HT and QT groups were observed at any time point. All patients had favorable outcomes and significantly improved evaluation scores.
The patients treated with QT autograft had clinical results and post-operative pain similar to those of patients treated with HT autograft for ACL reconstruction.
用于修复前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂的最常用移植物之一是腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物。然而,另一种修复ACL的建议选择是股四头肌肌腱(QT)自体移植物。本研究旨在比较接受QT自体移植物和HT自体移植物治疗的ACL损伤患者之间的疼痛情况和临床结果。
我们机构的伦理与调查委员会批准了该研究。患者被随机分为两组:一组接受QT自体移植物治疗,另一组接受HT自体移植物治疗。在术前以及术后2周、1、3、6和12个月时,使用Lysholm - Tegner评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节评估表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对患者进行评估。
本研究共纳入28例原发性ACL损伤患者。在任何时间点,HT组和QT组之间在VAS疼痛评分、Lysholm膝关节评分和Tegner活动量表评分以及IKDC评分方面均未观察到显著差异。所有患者均取得了良好的结果,评估分数显著提高。
接受QT自体移植物治疗的患者在ACL重建方面的临床结果和术后疼痛情况与接受HT自体移植物治疗的患者相似。