Tang Neset, Eren Murat, Gurpinar Tahsin, Ozturkmen Yusuf
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam St. Number 11, 34147, Bakirkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03636-5. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. However, the ideal graft source is still debatable. This study compared hamstring (HT) and bone-free quadriceps (QT) tendon autografts in terms of muscle strength and patient-reported outcomes.
Between June 2018 and December 2019, 46 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to one of two groups for the ACL reconstruction surgery-the HT autograft group or the QT autograft group. An experienced examiner performed preoperative and postoperative examinations. The HUMAC NORM isokinetic machine (Computer Sports Medicine International-CSMI, 2004) was used to assess flexor and extensor thigh muscle strength. Both groups received the same surgical technique and fixation method. All patients were examined after three, six, nine, and 12 months. The final evaluations were performed at the 24-month follow-up. Patients' scores on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. The two groups were also compared in terms of postoperative complications and activity levels.
The difference between preoperative and postoperative knee flexor peak torques (FPT) was lower in the QT group than in the HT group. The average difference between preoperative and postoperative knee extensor peak torque (EPT) was higher in the QT group than in the HT group. As a result, the HT group had a lower postoperative H/Q ratio (flexor strength normalized to body mass divided by extensor strength normalized to body mass) than the QT group (p < 0.001). The mean IKDC scores for the HT and QT groups were 90.13 ± 6.99 and 87.12 ± 6.61, respectively. The scores of the two groups postoperatively were close, and both groups showed significant improvement. The average graft size in the QT group was significantly greater than that in the HT group. Saphenous nerve palsy was the most common complication in the HT group (22%). Thigh hematomas were observed in two patients in the QT group and required urgent intervention (12%).
After ACL reconstruction, we found a significant decrease in strength at the donor sites in both techniques, with similar patient-reported measures and stability outcomes. The H/Q strength ratio was higher in the QT group postoperatively, which may have a protective effect on the reconstructed ligament. Level of Evidence I It is a randomized controlled trial.
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是全球最常见的外科手术之一。然而,理想的移植物来源仍存在争议。本研究比较了绳肌(HT)和无骨股四头肌(QT)肌腱自体移植物在肌肉力量和患者报告结局方面的差异。
2018年6月至2019年12月期间,46例患者纳入本研究,并随机分为两组接受ACL重建手术——HT自体移植物组或QT自体移植物组。由一名经验丰富的检查者进行术前和术后检查。使用HUMAC NORM等速肌力测试仪(国际计算机运动医学-CSMI,2004年)评估大腿屈肌和伸肌力量。两组采用相同的手术技术和固定方法。所有患者在术后3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月接受检查。最终评估在24个月随访时进行。采用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评估表和Lysholm膝关节评分量表的患者评分来评估患者报告结局。还比较了两组术后并发症和活动水平。
QT组术后膝关节屈肌峰值扭矩(FPT)术前与术后的差异低于HT组。QT组术后膝关节伸肌峰值扭矩(EPT)术前与术后的平均差异高于HT组。因此,HT组术后的H/Q比值(屈肌力量除以体重再除以伸肌力量除以体重)低于QT组(p<0.001)。HT组和QT组的IKDC平均评分分别为90.13±6.99和87.12±6.61。两组术后评分相近,且两组均显示出显著改善。QT组的平均移植物尺寸显著大于HT组。隐神经麻痹是HT组最常见的并发症(22%)。QT组有2例患者出现大腿血肿,需要紧急干预(12%)。
ACL重建术后,我们发现两种技术的供区力量均显著下降,患者报告的测量结果和稳定性结局相似。QT组术后的H/Q力量比值较高,这可能对重建韧带具有保护作用。证据等级I 这是一项随机对照试验。