• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

React 68 抽吸导管的初步经验。

Initial experience with React 68 aspiration catheter.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;26(3):358-363. doi: 10.1177/1591019919898923. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1177/1591019919898923
PMID:31969073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254626/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We describe our initial experience with the React 68 catheter (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), an FDA-approved catheter designed for aspiration in cases of emergent large vessel occlusion, as compared with the ACE 68 catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, CA).

METHODS

This observational study followed consecutive patients treated with the React catheter over a seven-month period at a comprehensive stroke center. Use of the device was per discretion of the operator. Patient demographics, thrombectomy technique, reperfusion scoring, and disposition were assessed. Performance was compared with patients treated with the ACE 68 catheter over a comparable period.

RESULTS

We treated 47 patients using the React 68 catheter using either aspiration alone or a combination of aspiration and stent retriever technique. The catheter was used in a variety of circumstances including proximal and distal occlusions involving the anterior and posterior circulation. Modified TICI 2b-3 was achieved in 45 of the 47 patients. The React 68 was comparable to the ACE 68 by all performance measures.

CONCLUSION

The React 68 catheter is a large-bore reperfusion catheter with trackability suitable for use in direct aspiration for recanalization of emergent large vessel occlusion.

摘要

简介

我们介绍了我们在使用 React 68 导管(美敦力,都柏林,爱尔兰)方面的初步经验,这是一种经过 FDA 批准的导管,设计用于在紧急大血管闭塞时进行抽吸,与 ACE 68 导管(Penumbra,阿拉米达,加利福尼亚州)进行比较。

方法

这项观察性研究在一个综合性卒中中心对在七个月期间接受 React 导管治疗的连续患者进行了随访。该设备的使用由操作者决定。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、血栓切除术技术、再灌注评分和处置情况。将其与在可比时间段内接受 ACE 68 导管治疗的患者进行了比较。

结果

我们使用 React 68 导管治疗了 47 例患者,单独使用抽吸或抽吸和支架回收器技术联合使用。该导管用于多种情况,包括涉及前循环和后循环的近端和远端闭塞。在 47 例患者中的 45 例中实现了改良 TICI 2b-3。在所有性能指标上,React 68 导管均与 ACE 68 导管相当。

结论

React 68 导管是一种大口径再灌注导管,具有可追踪性,适用于直接抽吸以再通紧急大血管闭塞。

相似文献

1
Initial experience with React 68 aspiration catheter.React 68 抽吸导管的初步经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;26(3):358-363. doi: 10.1177/1591019919898923. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Efficacy of ADAPT with large-bore reperfusion catheter in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a multicentric Italian experience.大口径再灌注导管 ADAPT 在急性前循环缺血性脑卒中中的疗效:多中心意大利经验。
Radiol Med. 2020 Jan;125(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01069-x. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
A direct aspiration first-pass technique vs stentriever thrombectomy in emergent large vessel intracranial occlusions.直接抽吸首过技术与支架取栓术治疗急性大血管颅内闭塞。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):567-574. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161563. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Bigger is Still Better: A Step Forward in Reperfusion With React 71.越大越好:使用React 71在再灌注方面向前迈进了一步。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Mar 15;88(4):758-762. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa498.
5
Single-Center Experience Using the 3MAX Reperfusion Catheter for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke with Distal Arterial Occlusions.3MAX 再灌注导管治疗伴有远端动脉闭塞的急性缺血性脑卒中的单中心经验。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;28(4):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0594-8. Epub 2017 May 15.
6
A direct aspiration first pass technique with the new ARC catheter for thrombectomy of large vessel occlusion strokes: A multicenter study.一项使用新型ARC导管进行大血管闭塞性卒中血栓切除术的直接抽吸首次通过技术:一项多中心研究。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Apr;25(2):187-193. doi: 10.1177/1591019918803962. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
ARTS (Aspiration-Retriever Technique for Stroke): Initial clinical experience.ARTS(卒中抽吸- Retrieval技术):初步临床经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;22(3):325-32. doi: 10.1177/1591019916632369. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
First-Line Sofia Aspiration Thrombectomy Approach within the Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Multicentric Registry: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors of Success.多中心登记研究中血管内治疗缺血性卒中的一线 Sofia 抽吸血栓切除术方法:疗效、安全性和成功的预测因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):1006-1012. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6074. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Utility of the novel guide catheter in mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large vessel occlusion stroke.新型导引导管在机械取栓治疗急性大血管闭塞性脑卒中的应用
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):336-341. doi: 10.1177/15910199221084483. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Initial clinical experience using the two-stage aspiration technique (TSAT) with proximal flow arrest by a balloon guiding catheter for acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation.应用两段式抽吸技术(TSAT)联合球囊导引导管行近端血流阻断治疗急性前循环缺血性脑卒中的初步临床经验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1160-1165. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012787. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of aspiration catheter inner diameter on first-pass effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抽吸导管内径对首次通过效应的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 10:15910199251345637. doi: 10.1177/15910199251345637.
2
Initial Experience Using the New pHLO 0.072-inch Large-Bore Catheter for Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.使用新型pHLO 0.072英寸大口径导管进行急性缺血性卒中直接抽吸血栓切除术的初步经验。
Neurointervention. 2023 Mar;18(1):30-37. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00479. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
REACT Aspiration Catheters: Clinical Experience and Technical Considerations.REACT抽吸导管:临床经验与技术考量
Neurointervention. 2022 Jul;17(2):70-77. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00255. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
4
Thrombectomy aspiration post-market study in acute stroke with the Q aspiration catheter: the TAPAS study.取栓抽吸术在后市场研究急性脑卒中与 Q 抽吸导管:TAPAS 研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):674-678. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018649. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of current rates of first pass effect by thrombectomy technique and associations with clinical outcomes.系统评价和荟萃分析当前血栓切除术技术的初次通过效果率及其与临床结局的关联。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Mar;13(3):212-216. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016869. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术作为血管内治疗大动脉闭塞(COMPASS)的一线治疗方法:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法结局、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.
2
First attempt recanalization with ADAPT: rate, predictors, and outcome.初次尝试使用 ADAPT 进行再通:再通率、预测因素和结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jul;11(7):641-645. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014294. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Lessons Learned Over More than 500 Stroke Thrombectomies Using ADAPT With Increasing Aspiration Catheter Size.超过 500 例使用 ADAPT 治疗且取栓导管尺寸不断增大的脑卒中取栓经验总结
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy444.
4
Outcomes of Stent Retriever versus Aspiration-First Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支架取栓与抽吸优先血栓切除术治疗缺血性脑卒中的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2070-2076. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5825. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Larger ACE 68 aspiration catheter increases first-pass efficacy of ADAPT technique.更大口径的 ACE 68 抽吸导管可提高 ADAPT 技术的首次通过效果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):141-146. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013957. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
7
Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging.6至16小时卒中的血栓切除术及灌注成像选择
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
8
Safety and Efficacy of a 3-Dimensional Stent Retriever With Aspiration-Based Thrombectomy vs Aspiration-Based Thrombectomy Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.3D 支架取栓联合与单纯抽吸血栓清除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中介入治疗的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):304-311. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3967.
9
Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.发病后 6 至 24 小时内进行取栓术治疗与缺损和梗死不匹配的脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique vs Standard Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接抽吸首过技术与标准血管内治疗急性脑卒中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jul 1;83(1):19-28. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx386.