• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中国大学生简短自我控制量表的维度及心理测量特性。

Evaluating the Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of the Brief Self-Control Scale Amongst Chinese University Students.

作者信息

Fung Sai-Fu, Kong Chris Yiu Wah, Huang Qian

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Department of Sports Training, Xi'an Physical Education University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 8;10:2903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02903. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02903
PMID:31969852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6960225/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) using a sample of university students in mainland China. Nine hundred and three students from a Chinese university participated in this study. The internal consistency, criterion validity, factorial validity and construct validity of the scale were examined. The Chinese versions of the BSCS demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81. The BSCS also showed significant moderate correlations with other construct-related scales. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested that only a modified 11-item BSCS with a four-factor structure was a good model fit in the sample of Chinese university students, as χ (106.626)/37 = 2.88, SRMR = 0.036, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.992, Tucker-Lewis fit index (TLI) = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.046. The implications for research and theoretical development are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在以中国大陆的大学生为样本,评估简版自我控制量表(BSCS)的维度及心理测量特性。来自一所中国大学的903名学生参与了本研究。对该量表的内部一致性、效标效度、因子效度和结构效度进行了检验。BSCS的中文版表现出良好的内部一致性,克朗巴哈系数为0.81。BSCS与其他相关结构量表也呈现出显著的中度相关性。探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,只有一个经过修改的、具有四因素结构的11项BSCS在中国大学生样本中拟合良好,χ(106.626)/37 = 2.88,SRMR = 0.036,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.992,塔克-刘易斯拟合指数(TLI) = 0.989,近似误差均方根(RMSEA) = 0.046。本文还讨论了该研究对研究和理论发展的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98d/6960225/aa3021d47c5b/fpsyg-10-02903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98d/6960225/aa3021d47c5b/fpsyg-10-02903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b98d/6960225/aa3021d47c5b/fpsyg-10-02903-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of the Brief Self-Control Scale Amongst Chinese University Students.评估中国大学生简短自我控制量表的维度及心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 8;10:2903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02903. eCollection 2019.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) with Chinese University Students.中文大学生 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 14;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1113-1.
4
Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Tangney's Brief Self-Control Scale in Chinese Adolescents.《坦尼简短自我控制量表在中国青少年中的因子结构和纵向测量不变性》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;10:802448. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.802448. eCollection 2022.
5
The future disposition Inventory-24: reliability and validity estimates in a large sample of Chinese University students.未来处置问卷-24:在一大群中国大学生样本中的信度和效度估计。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1875-8.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Orientation Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Study on Chinese University Students.《运动取向问卷的心理测量特性:对中国大学生的验证性研究》
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;9:574335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.574335. eCollection 2021.
7
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
8
Cross-cultural validation of the Social Media Disorder scale.社交媒体障碍量表的跨文化验证
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Aug 19;12:683-690. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S216788. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the German Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and its potential for cross-cultural comparisons: a cross-sectional study.评估德国医院患者安全文化调查的心理测量特性及其进行跨文化比较的潜力:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 9;7(11):e018366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018366.
10
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a Professional Identity Scale for Healthcare Students and Professionals.医学生和医疗专业人员职业认同量表中文版的编制与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):451. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040451.

引用本文的文献

1
The more self-control, the more anxious?- A network analysis study of the relationship between self-control and psychological anxiety among Chinese university students.自我控制越强,焦虑感越高吗?——中国大学生自我控制与心理焦虑关系的网络分析研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 12;12(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02099-5.
2
The Relationship between Game Addiction and Aggression among Adolescents with Mediating Role of Narcissism and Self-Control.自恋与自我控制起中介作用下青少年游戏成瘾与攻击性的关系
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;19(3):274-284. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i3.15804.
3
Testing the latent structure, factorial equivalence, and external correlates of the brief self-control scale in a community sample of Spanish adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Examination of the validity and reliability of the French version of the Brief Self-Control Scale.法语版简短自我控制量表的效度和信度检验。
Can J Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;49(4):243-250. doi: 10.1037/cbs0000086.
2
Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: the mediating role of mobile phone use patterns.中国大学生的自我控制与问题性手机使用:手机使用模式的中介作用
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1131-z.
3
Evidence of Factorial Validity of Parental Knowledge, Control and Solicitation, and Adolescent Disclosure Scales: When the Ordered Nature of Likert Scales Matters.
在西班牙成年人的社区样本中测试简短自我控制量表的潜在结构、因子等效性和外部相关性。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0296719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296719. eCollection 2024.
4
Want-to, have-to, amotivation, grit, self-control, and tolerance ambiguity among university students: latent profile analysis.大学生的想要、必须、动机缺乏、坚毅、自我控制和容忍模糊性:潜在剖面分析。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 2;11(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01298-w.
5
A Mobile Self-control Training App to Improve Self-control and Physical Activity in People With Severe Mental Illness: Protocol for 2 Single-Case Experimental Designs.一款用于改善重度精神疾病患者自我控制能力和身体活动水平的移动自我控制训练应用程序:两项单病例实验设计方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 5;12:e37727. doi: 10.2196/37727.
6
The many foibles of Likert scales challenge claims that self-report measures of self-control are better than performance-based measures.利克特量表的诸多缺陷,对自我控制的自评测量优于基于表现的测量这一说法提出了挑战。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):908-933. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02089-2. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Bold, mean and disinhibited: getting specific about the mediating role of self-control and antisocial outcomes in youth.大胆、吝啬与行为失范:明确自我控制与青少年反社会行为结果的中介作用
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Dec 5;29(6):871-888. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1995519. eCollection 2022.
8
Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item WHO Well-Being Index.5 项世界卫生组织幸福指数中文版的有效性和心理测量学评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;10:872436. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872436. eCollection 2022.
9
Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Tangney's Brief Self-Control Scale in Chinese Adolescents.《坦尼简短自我控制量表在中国青少年中的因子结构和纵向测量不变性》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;10:802448. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.802448. eCollection 2022.
10
Individual Differences in Testosterone and Self-Control Predict Compulsive Sexual Behavior Proneness in Young Males.睾酮水平和自我控制能力的个体差异可预测年轻男性的强迫性性行为倾向。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:723449. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723449. eCollection 2021.
父母知识、控制与请求以及青少年披露量表的因素效度证据:当李克特量表的有序性质起作用时。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 22;7:941. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00941. eCollection 2016.
4
The revising of the Tangney Self-Control Scale for Chinese students.针对中国学生的唐尼自我控制量表的修订。
Psych J. 2016 Jun;5(2):101-16. doi: 10.1002/pchj.128. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Validation of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in a population of people using Secondary Care Mental Health Services.沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)在使用二级护理心理健康服务人群中的效度验证。
J Ment Health. 2016 Aug;25(4):323-329. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124401. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
7
The brief self-control scale predicts jail inmates' recidivism, substance dependence, and post-release adjustment.简易自我控制量表可预测监狱服刑人员的累犯、药物依赖及出狱后的适应情况。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;40(3):334-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167213511666. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
8
Taking stock of self-control: a meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors.自我控制盘点:特质自我控制与广泛行为关系的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;16(1):76-99. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418749. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
A Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of Self-Control Measures.自我控制测量方法的收敛效度的元分析
J Res Pers. 2011 Jun 1;45(3):259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004.
10
The Relationship of Self-Control and Abstinence Maintenance: An Exploratory Analysis of Self-Regulation.自我控制与节制维持的关系:自我调节的探索性分析
J Groups Addict Recover. 2009 Jan 1;4(1/2):32-41. doi: 10.1080/15560350802712371.