School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 25;705:135834. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135834. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
Between November 2018 and January 2019, samples of air and soil were collected from locations downwind and upwind of 10 landfills across the Republic of Ireland. Samples of groundwater (n = 10) were also collected from locations with links traceable to the studied landfills. Concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclodecane (HBCDD), and decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) determined in air and soil samples were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between downwind and upwind locations. The arithmetic mean concentration of PFOA in groundwater sourced from landfills (n = 4) that were not fully lined (69 ng/L) exceeded that in groundwater samples sourced from lined landfills (n = 6; 4.1 ng/L), with the difference, however being not statistically significant (p > 0.1). A positive correlation (p = 0.014) was observed between concentrations of PFOA in groundwater in our study and those reported previously in leachate from the same landfills. However, this correlation was driven substantially by one landfill which displayed the highest concentrations in both groundwater and leachate and no significant correlation (p > 0.1) was observed between log-transformed concentrations of PFOA in groundwater and leachate. DBDPE was detected in groundwater for the first time anywhere, in all samples at concentrations (median = 9.4 ng/L; arithmetic mean = 78 ng/L) that exceeded those of any other BFRs or PFASs targeted in this study. This likely reflects its recent use as a "drop-in" replacement for the recently restricted Decabromodiphenyl ether product. Overall, our data suggest that the 10 landfills studied do not exert a discernible influence on local air and soil concentrations of BFRs and PFASs. In contrast, while not of immediate concern, our data suggest that further more detailed study of the impact of landfill emissions on concentrations of DBDPE and PFOA is advisable.
2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,在爱尔兰共和国的 10 个垃圾填埋场的下风处和上风处采集了空气和土壤样本。还从与研究中的垃圾填埋场有可追溯联系的位置采集了地下水样本(n=10)。在空气和土壤样本中测定的全氟烷基物质(PFASs)、多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)、六溴环十二烷(HBCDD)和十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)浓度在下风处和上风处没有显著差异(p>0.05)。来自未完全衬砌的垃圾填埋场(n=4)的地下水(来源)中 PFOA 的算术平均值(69ng/L)高于来自衬砌垃圾填埋场的地下水样本(n=6;4.1ng/L),但差异无统计学意义(p>0.1)。我们的研究中,地下水样本中 PFOA 浓度与先前从同一垃圾填埋场渗滤液中报告的浓度之间存在正相关关系(p=0.014)。然而,这种相关性主要是由一个垃圾填埋场驱动的,该垃圾填埋场在地下水和渗滤液中都显示出最高的浓度,而地下水和渗滤液中 PFOA 的对数转换浓度之间没有观察到显著相关性(p>0.1)。DBDPE 是首次在任何地方的地下水样本中被检测到,在所有样本中的浓度(中位数=9.4ng/L;算术平均值=78ng/L)均高于本研究中针对的任何其他 BFRs 或 PFASs。这可能反映了它最近作为最近受限制的十溴二苯醚产品的替代品的使用。总体而言,我们的数据表明,研究中的 10 个垃圾填埋场不会对当地空气和土壤中的 BFRs 和 PFASs 浓度产生明显影响。相比之下,尽管目前还不是一个紧迫的问题,但我们的数据表明,进一步更详细地研究垃圾填埋场排放对 DBDPE 和 PFOA 浓度的影响是明智的。