• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感地标在具身任务和非具身任务中的作用。

The Role of Emotional Landmarks in Embodied and Not-Embodied Tasks.

作者信息

Piccardi Laura, Guariglia Paola, Nori Raffaella, Palmiero Massimiliano

机构信息

Life, Health and Environmental Science Department, L'Aquila University, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.

Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation and Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Jan 21;10(2):58. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020058.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci10020058
PMID:31972964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071467/
Abstract

The role of emotional landmarks in navigation has been scarcely studied. Previous findings showed that valence and arousal of landmarks increase landmark's salience and improve performance in navigational memory tasks. However, no study has directly explored the interplay between valence and arousal of emotionally laden landmarks in embodied and not-embodied navigational tasks. At the aim, 115 college students have been subdivided in five groups according to the landmarks they were exposed (High Positive Landmarks HPL; Low Positive Landmarks LPL; High Negative Landmarks HNL; Low Negative Landmarks LNL and Neutral Landmarks NeuL). In the embodied tasks participants were asked to learn a path in a first-person perspective and to recall it after five minutes, whereas in the not-embodied tasks participants were asked to track the learned path on a silent map and to recognize landmarks among distractors. Results highlighted firstly the key role of valence in the embodied task related to the immediate learning, but not to the delayed recall of the path, probably because of the short retention interval used. Secondly, results showed the importance of the interplay between valence and arousal in the non-embodied tasks, specifically, neutral and high negative emotional landmarks yielded the lowest performance probably because of the avoidance learning effect. Implications for future research directions are discussed.

摘要

情感地标在导航中的作用鲜有研究。先前的研究结果表明,地标的效价和唤醒度会增加地标的显著性,并提高导航记忆任务的表现。然而,尚无研究直接探讨在具身和非具身导航任务中,充满情感的地标的效价和唤醒度之间的相互作用。为此,115名大学生根据他们所接触的地标被分为五组(高积极地标组HPL;低积极地标组LPL;高消极地标组HNL;低消极地标组LNL和中性地标组NeuL)。在具身任务中,要求参与者以第一人称视角学习一条路径,并在五分钟后回忆;而在非具身任务中,要求参与者在一张无声地图上追踪所学路径,并在干扰物中识别地标。结果首先突出了效价在与即时学习相关的具身任务中的关键作用,但与路径的延迟回忆无关,这可能是由于所使用的保持间隔较短。其次,结果表明在非具身任务中,效价和唤醒度之间相互作用的重要性,具体而言,中性和高消极情感地标产生的表现最低,这可能是由于回避学习效应。文中还讨论了对未来研究方向的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/7071467/28d6f2a80bb1/brainsci-10-00058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/7071467/3b5b6e859169/brainsci-10-00058-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/7071467/28d6f2a80bb1/brainsci-10-00058-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/7071467/3b5b6e859169/brainsci-10-00058-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c5/7071467/28d6f2a80bb1/brainsci-10-00058-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Emotional Landmarks in Embodied and Not-Embodied Tasks.情感地标在具身任务和非具身任务中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2020 Jan 21;10(2):58. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020058.
2
The Role of Emotional Landmarks on Topographical Memory.情感地标在地形记忆中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00763. eCollection 2017.
3
Age-Related Differences in Associative Learning of Landmarks and Heading Directions in a Virtual Navigation Task.虚拟导航任务中地标与航向关联学习的年龄相关差异
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 May 27;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00122. eCollection 2016.
4
The Influence of Stimuli Valence and Arousal on Spatio-Temporal Representation of a Route.刺激效价和唤醒对路线时空表征的影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 19;11(6):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060814.
5
Turn left where you felt unhappy: how affect influences landmark-based wayfinding.在你感到不开心的地方向左转:情绪如何影响基于地标的寻路。
Cogn Process. 2017 May;18(2):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0790-0. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Putting emotions in routes: the influence of emotionally laden landmarks on spatial memory.将情感融入路线:情感地标对空间记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1083-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1015-6. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
The effects of emotion on younger and older adults' monitoring of learning.情绪对年轻人和老年人学习监控的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017 Sep;24(5):555-574. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1227423. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Episodic memory for emotional and non-emotional words in individuals with anhedonia.快感缺乏个体对情感性和非情感性词汇的情景记忆。
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Aug 30;143(2-3):121-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.030. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
9
Memory effects of sleep, emotional valence, arousal and novelty in children.儿童睡眠、情绪效价、唤醒度和新颖性的记忆效应。
J Sleep Res. 2017 Jun;26(3):309-317. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12506. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
10
Embodied Emotion Regulation: The Influence of Implicit Emotional Compatibility on Creative Thinking.具身情绪调节:内隐情绪兼容性对创造性思维的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;11:1822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01822. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of negative emotion processing on spatial navigation: an experimental study using virtual reality.消极情绪加工对空间导航的影响:一项使用虚拟现实的实验研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 11;14:1301981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1301981. eCollection 2023.
2
The Role of Body in Brain Plasticity.身体在大脑可塑性中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):277. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020277.
3
Building Embodied Spaces for Spatial Memory Neurorehabilitation with Virtual Reality in Normal and Pathological Aging.利用虚拟现实为正常衰老和病理性衰老中的空间记忆神经康复构建具身空间

本文引用的文献

1
How does environmental knowledge allow us to come back home?环境知识如何让我们回归家园?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jul;237(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05552-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
2
The format of mental imagery: from a critical review to an integrated embodied representation approach.心理意象的形式:从批判性综述到整合的具身表征方法
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):277-289. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00908-z. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
3
How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 14;11(8):1067. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081067.
4
The Influence of Stimuli Valence and Arousal on Spatio-Temporal Representation of a Route.刺激效价和唤醒对路线时空表征的影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 19;11(6):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060814.
5
The Role of Gender and Familiarity in a Modified Version of the Almeria Boxes Room Spatial Task.性别与熟悉程度在阿尔梅里亚盒子房间空间任务修改版中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2021 May 22;11(6):681. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060681.
6
Landmarks in wayfinding: a review of the existing literature.地标在寻路中的作用:现有文献综述。
Cogn Process. 2021 Aug;22(3):369-410. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
The Road More Travelled: The Differential Effects of Spatial Experience in Young and Elderly Participants.走得更多的路:年轻和老年参与者的空间体验的差异效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 15;18(2):709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020709.
8
Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory.边走边聊不会干扰地形工作记忆。
Brain Sci. 2020 Nov 2;10(11):811. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110811.
9
Effects of the Design of Overview Maps on Three-Dimensional Virtual Environment Interfaces.概览图设计对三维虚拟环境界面的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 16;20(16):4605. doi: 10.3390/s20164605.
10
The Relationship between Emotionally Laden Landmarks, Spatial Abilities, and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study.充满情感的地标、空间能力与人格特质之间的关系:一项探索性研究。
Brain Sci. 2020 May 27;10(6):326. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10060326.
你会如何描述一条熟悉的路线,或者将沿途的地标按顺序排列?这取决于你的认知风格!
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3121-3129. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5367-3. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Continuous Environmental Changes May Enhance Topographic Memory Skills. Evidence From L'Aquila Earthquake-Exposed Survivors.持续的环境变化可能会增强地形记忆技能。来自拉奎拉地震幸存者的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 7;12:318. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00318. eCollection 2018.
5
Putting emotions in routes: the influence of emotionally laden landmarks on spatial memory.将情感融入路线:情感地标对空间记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1083-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1015-6. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
The Role of Emotional Landmarks on Topographical Memory.情感地标在地形记忆中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00763. eCollection 2017.
7
Emotional arousal impairs association-memory: Roles of amygdala and hippocampus.情绪唤醒损害联想记忆:杏仁核和海马的作用。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.065. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Turn left where you felt unhappy: how affect influences landmark-based wayfinding.在你感到不开心的地方向左转:情绪如何影响基于地标的寻路。
Cogn Process. 2017 May;18(2):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0790-0. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
Finding the Return Path: Landmark Position Effects and the Influence of Perspective.寻找返回路径:地标位置效应与视角的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 23;7:1956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01956. eCollection 2016.
10
Avoidance learning: a review of theoretical models and recent developments.回避学习:理论模型与最新进展综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jul 21;9:189. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00189. eCollection 2015.