Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre, Hämtställe HS 36, Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Inga Marie Nilssons gata 49, 20502, Malmö, Sweden.
Diabetologia. 2020 May;63(5):1043-1054. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05093-9. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Evidence that glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and/or the GIP receptor (GIPR) are involved in cardiovascular biology is emerging. We hypothesised that GIP has untoward effects on cardiovascular biology, in contrast to glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and therefore investigated the effects of GIP and GLP-1 concentrations on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk.
GIP concentrations were successfully measured during OGTTs in two independent populations (Malmö Diet Cancer-Cardiovascular Cohort [MDC-CC] and Prevalence, Prediction and Prevention of Diabetes in Botnia [PPP-Botnia]) in a total of 8044 subjects. GLP-1 (n = 3625) was measured in MDC-CC. The incidence of CVD and mortality was assessed via national/regional registers or questionnaires. Further, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (2SMR) analysis between the GIP pathway and outcomes (coronary artery disease [CAD] and myocardial infarction) was carried out using a GIP-associated genetic variant, rs1800437, as instrumental variable. An additional reverse 2SMR was performed with CAD as exposure variable and GIP as outcome variable, with the instrumental variables constructed from 114 known genetic risk variants for CAD.
In meta-analyses, higher fasting levels of GIP were associated with risk of higher total mortality (HR[95% CI] = 1.22 [1.11, 1.35]; p = 4.5 × 10) and death from CVD (HR[95% CI] 1.30 [1.11, 1.52]; p = 0.001). In accordance, 2SMR analysis revealed that increasing GIP concentrations were associated with CAD and myocardial infarction, and an additional reverse 2SMR revealed no significant effect of CAD on GIP levels, thus confirming a possible effect solely of GIP on CAD.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In two prospective, community-based studies, elevated levels of GIP were associated with greater risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality within 5-9 years of follow-up, whereas GLP-1 levels were not associated with excess risk. Further studies are warranted to determine the cardiovascular effects of GIP per se.
目的/假设:越来越多的证据表明葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素释放肽(GIP)和/或 GIP 受体(GIPR)参与了心血管生物学。我们假设 GIP 对心血管生物学有不良影响,与胰高血糖素样肽 1(GLP-1)相反,因此研究了 GIP 和 GLP-1 浓度对心血管疾病(CVD)和死亡风险的影响。
在总共 8044 名受试者的两个独立人群(马尔默饮食癌症-心血管队列[MDC-CC]和博尼亚糖尿病的患病率、预测和预防[PPP-Botnia])的 OGTT 期间成功测量了 GIP 浓度。MDC-CC 中测量了 GLP-1(n=3625)。通过国家/地区登记处或问卷调查评估 CVD 和死亡率的发生情况。此外,使用与 GIP 相关的遗传变异 rs1800437 作为工具变量,对 GIP 通路与结局(冠状动脉疾病[CAD]和心肌梗死)之间进行了两样本孟德尔随机化(2SMR)分析。使用从 114 个已知 CAD 遗传风险变异构建的工具变量,进行了 CAD 作为暴露变量和 GIP 作为结局变量的反向 2SMR。
在荟萃分析中,空腹 GIP 水平较高与较高的总死亡率风险相关(HR[95%CI] = 1.22 [1.11, 1.35];p=4.5×10)和 CVD 死亡风险(HR[95%CI] 1.30 [1.11, 1.52];p=0.001)。同样,2SMR 分析显示,GIP 浓度的升高与 CAD 和心肌梗死有关,而额外的反向 2SMR 显示 CAD 对 GIP 水平没有显著影响,从而证实了 GIP 对 CAD 可能只有单一影响。
结论/解释:在两项前瞻性、基于社区的研究中,GIP 水平升高与随访 5-9 年内全因和心血管死亡率的风险增加相关,而 GLP-1 水平与超额风险无关。需要进一步研究以确定 GIP 本身对心血管的影响。