Suppr超能文献

leans back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals.

Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals.

机构信息

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227955. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Outbreaks of communicable diseases in hospitals need to be quickly detected in order to enable immediate control. The increasing digitalization of hospital data processing offers potential solutions for automated outbreak detection systems (AODS). Our goal was to assess a newly developed AODS.

METHODS

Our AODS was based on the diagnostic results of routine clinical microbiological examinations. The system prospectively counted detections per bacterial pathogen over time for the years 2016 and 2017. The baseline data covers data from 2013-2015. The comparative analysis was based on six different mathematical algorithms (normal/Poisson and score prediction intervals, the early aberration reporting system, negative binomial CUSUMs, and the Farrington algorithm). The clusters automatically detected were then compared with the results of our manual outbreak detection system.

RESULTS

During the analysis period, 14 different hospital outbreaks were detected as a result of conventional manual outbreak detection. Based on the pathogens' overall incidence, outbreaks were divided into two categories: outbreaks with rarely detected pathogens (sporadic) and outbreaks with often detected pathogens (endemic). For outbreaks with sporadic pathogens, the detection rate of our AODS ranged from 83% to 100%. Every algorithm detected 6 of 7 outbreaks with a sporadic pathogen. The AODS identified outbreaks with an endemic pathogen were at a detection rate of 33% to 100%. For endemic pathogens, the results varied based on the epidemiological characteristics of each outbreak and pathogen.

CONCLUSION

AODS for hospitals based on routine microbiological data is feasible and can provide relevant benefits for infection control teams. It offers in-time automated notification of suspected pathogen clusters especially for sporadically occurring pathogens. However, outbreaks of endemically detected pathogens need further individual pathogen-specific and setting-specific adjustments.

摘要

简介

为了能够及时进行控制,医院内传染病的爆发需要迅速被检测到。医院数据处理的日益数字化为自动爆发检测系统(AODS)提供了潜在的解决方案。我们的目标是评估一种新开发的 AODS。

方法

我们的 AODS 基于常规临床微生物学检查的诊断结果。该系统前瞻性地计算了 2016 年和 2017 年每个细菌病原体随时间的检测次数。基线数据涵盖了 2013-2015 年的数据。比较分析基于六种不同的数学算法(正态/泊松和评分预测区间、早期异常报告系统、负二项式 CUSUMs 和 Farrington 算法)。然后将自动检测到的集群与我们手动爆发检测系统的结果进行比较。

结果

在分析期间,由于常规手动爆发检测,共发现 14 种不同的医院爆发。根据病原体的总体发病率,爆发分为两类:罕见检测到病原体的爆发(散发性)和经常检测到病原体的爆发(地方性)。对于罕见病原体的爆发,我们的 AODS 的检测率为 83%至 100%。每种算法都检测到 7 个散发性病原体爆发中的 6 个。AODS 对地方性病原体的识别率为 33%至 100%。对于地方性病原体,结果因每个爆发和病原体的流行病学特征而异。

结论

基于常规微生物数据的医院 AODS 是可行的,可以为感染控制团队提供相关的益处。它可以及时自动通知疑似病原体集群,特别是对于偶发性发生的病原体。然而,地方性检测到的病原体爆发需要进一步进行特定病原体和特定环境的调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c681/6980399/80bd43e91277/pone.0227955.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验