• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚父母健康素养技能工具的验证:父母加技能指数。

Validation of an Australian parenting health literacy skills instrument: The parenting plus skills index.

机构信息

Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Short Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1245-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.012
PMID:31982204
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Existing instruments for assessing health literacy skills in parents have limited scope to inform the design and evaluation of health literacy interventions. In this study we aimed to develop and validate a new performance-based measure of health literacy for Australian parents, the Parenting Plus Skills Index (PPSI). The instrument aimed to assess functional, communicative and critical health literacy skills.

METHODS

The PPSI was developed in three phases: 1) Modified Delphi Expert Panel to provide feedback on 34 initial items; 2) Evaluation of psychometric properties of each item using a multidimensional item response theory model in a sample of Australian adults of parenting age (20-44 years) (N = 500); 3) Assessment of subset of items in an independent sample (N = 500).

RESULTS

Following the three phases, 13 items were included in the final instrument. Participants scored on average 8.9/13 (69 %). The instrument demonstrated acceptable reliability (r = 0.70) and was significantly correlated with other performance-based health literacy instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPSI is a validated 13-item performance-based instrument that assesses health literacy skills for parents in an Australian setting.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The PPSI fills an important gap in available health literacy instruments that may be useful for facilitating development and evaluation of health literacy interventions.

摘要

目的

现有的家长健康素养技能评估工具在为健康素养干预的设计和评估提供信息方面存在局限性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的基于表现的澳大利亚家长健康素养测量工具,即育儿加技能指数(PPSI)。该工具旨在评估功能性、交际性和批判性健康素养技能。

方法

PPSI 分三个阶段开发:1)修改德尔菲专家小组对 34 个初始项目的反馈;2)在有育儿年龄(20-44 岁)的澳大利亚成年人样本(N=500)中使用多维项目反应理论模型评估每个项目的心理测量特性;3)在独立样本(N=500)中评估项目子集。

结果

经过三个阶段,最终工具包括 13 个项目。参与者的平均得分为 8.9/13(69%)。该工具具有可接受的可靠性(r=0.70),并与其他基于表现的健康素养工具显著相关。

结论

PPSI 是一种经过验证的 13 项基于表现的工具,可评估澳大利亚家长的健康素养技能。

实践意义

PPSI 填补了现有健康素养工具的重要空白,可能有助于促进健康素养干预的制定和评估。

相似文献

1
Validation of an Australian parenting health literacy skills instrument: The parenting plus skills index.澳大利亚父母健康素养技能工具的验证:父母加技能指数。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1245-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
2
Validation of health literacy domains for informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening using classical test theory and item response theory.使用经典测试理论和项目反应理论验证有关结直肠癌筛查的知情决策的健康素养领域。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2335-2343. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Embedding a Health Literacy Intervention Within Established Parenting Groups: An Australian Feasibility Study.将健康素养干预融入既有育儿群体:一项澳大利亚可行性研究。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;4(1):e67-e78. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200217-01.
4
Developing performance-based measures of health literacy: A narrative case study and checklist of considerations.发展基于绩效的健康素养衡量标准:案例叙述研究与考量清单。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2406-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool.澳大利亚协作实践评估工具的心理计量特性评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302834. eCollection 2024.
6
Development of a Greek Oral health literacy measurement instrument: GROHL.希腊口腔健康素养测量工具的研制:GROHL。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1000-5.
7
Development, validation and performance of a newly designed tool to evaluate functional medication literacy in Slovenia.开发、验证和性能评估一种新设计的工具,用于评估斯洛文尼亚的功能性药物素养。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1490-1498. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01138-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
10
Measuring health literacy: a pilot study of a new skills-based instrument.测量健康素养:一种新技能型工具的初步研究。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:51-71. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499987.

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy model integrating health education, health behaviors, self-rated health, and socioeconomic status in the Chinese population.整合健康教育、健康行为、自评健康和社会经济地位的中国人群健康素养模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 2;15(1):32320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07094-3.
2
Development and psychometric validation of a novel health literacy scale for family caregivers of preschool children.一种针对学龄前儿童家庭照顾者的新型健康素养量表的开发与心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02349-z.
3
Development and validation of a questionnaire on parental health literacy in the context of promoting healthy lifestyles during childhood: a study protocol.
儿童期促进健康生活方式背景下父母健康素养问卷的编制与验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 12;15(2):e088037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088037.
4
A new health literacy scale for staff in preschool childcare institution: development and preliminary validation.一种针对学前儿童保育机构工作人员的新健康素养量表:编制与初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21233-x.
5
Parental Health Literacy, Empowerment, and Advocacy for Food Allergy Safety in Schools: A Cross-Sectional Study.家长健康素养、赋权和倡导学校食物过敏安全:一项横断面研究。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jul;7(3):e165-e175. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230823-01. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
Cognitive and Cultural Factors That Affect General Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes.影响常规疫苗接种和新冠疫苗接种态度的认知与文化因素。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;11(1):94. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010094.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Caregivers of Children Aged 0 to 3 Years in China.中国 0-3 岁儿童照护者健康素养问卷的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316076.
8
The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.家长健康素养问卷(HLQ-Parent)。对癫痫患儿家长进行的改编及效度测试。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Feb;52(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/14034948221123436. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
10
Digital Interventions to Improve Health Literacy Among Parents of Children Aged 0 to 12 Years With a Health Condition: Systematic Review.数字干预措施提高健康素养的父母的孩子年龄 0 至 12 岁的健康状况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e31665. doi: 10.2196/31665.