• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉反馈对于双手人类时间间隔估计不重要。

Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, 7000 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84242, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):857-864. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01287-3. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01287-3
PMID:31982935
Abstract

The clock variance of intervals produced by one finger is reduced when that finger taps along with another finger (termed the bimanual advantage). The multiple-timekeeper model proposes a coupling of internal clocks, leading to reduced clock variance for bimanual timing. Alternatively, reduced variance for bimanual timing could result from additional sensory feedback from two fingers as opposed to one. We aimed to test the role of visual feedback in reducing temporal variability. Participants tapped unimanually and bimanually (with no table contact) in three conditions: full vision, blindfolded, and with additional visual feedback provided via a mirror reflecting the right hand. We predicted that temporal variability would be reduced for tapping with vision versus no vision, and when the left hand was represented by a mirror but did not actually tap. Additional, redundant visual information did not reduce temporal variability for any condition, suggesting that visual feedback is not crucial for bimanual advantage. These findings support the role of sensory feedback (namely, tactile, auditory, and proprioceptive) in reducing timekeeper variability during bimanual timing and argue against a strictly multiple-timekeeper model.

摘要

当一个手指与另一个手指一起敲击时,由一个手指产生的时间间隔的时钟方差会降低(称为双手优势)。多时钟模型提出了内部时钟的耦合,从而导致双手计时的时钟方差降低。或者,双手计时的方差降低可能是由于两个手指而不是一个手指提供了额外的感觉反馈。我们旨在测试视觉反馈在减少时间变化中的作用。参与者在三种条件下进行单手和双手(无桌面接触)敲击:全视觉、蒙住眼睛和通过镜子提供额外的视觉反馈,该镜子反映右手。我们预测,与无视觉相比,有视觉时敲击的时间变化会减少,而当左手由镜子表示但实际上并未敲击时,时间变化也会减少。对于任何条件,额外的冗余视觉信息都不会减少时间变化的可变性,这表明视觉反馈对于双手优势并非至关重要。这些发现支持了在双手计时过程中感觉反馈(即触觉、听觉和本体感觉)在减少时间保持器可变性中的作用,并反对严格的多时钟模型。

相似文献

1
Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.视觉反馈对于双手人类时间间隔估计不重要。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):857-864. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01287-3. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.交叉双臂会使生物钟紊乱:感觉反馈与双手协作优势
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):390-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0489-x.
3
The role of multiple internal timekeepers and sources of feedback on interval timing.多个内部计时机制及间隔计时反馈源的作用
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1960-1967. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1373835. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.感觉信息在周期性手指敲击序列产生中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jun;110(1):117-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00241381.
5
Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.双手耦合过程中时间变异性的降低:感觉信息的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Feb;56(2):329-50. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000396.
6
The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.双手手指敲击过程中触觉传入对时间规律性的贡献。
Psychol Res. 2002 Feb;66(1):60-70. doi: 10.1007/s004260100074.
7
Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.双手运动的时间安排与传入神经阻滞:对感觉运动效应作用的启示
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Sep;158(1):50-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1870-9. Epub 2004 Mar 9.
8
Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance.视触觉动作效果决定双手协调表现。
Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Aug;28(4):437-49. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
9
Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities?本体感觉对运动活动的时间安排重要吗?
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;73(2):255-61. doi: 10.1139/y95-036.
10
Dynamic Multisensory Integration: Somatosensory Speed Trumps Visual Accuracy during Feedback Control.动态多感官整合:在反馈控制过程中,体感速度胜过视觉准确性。
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 17;36(33):8598-611. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0184-16.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Head movements induced by voluntary neck flexion stabilize sensorimotor synchronization of the finger to syncopated auditory rhythms.由主动颈部屈曲引起的头部运动可稳定手指与切分听觉节奏的感觉运动同步。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1335050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335050. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event.当任务共享一个显著事件时,时间进程是相关的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1565-75. doi: 10.1037/a0020380.
2
Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization.运动的兼容性促进了运动知觉同步。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1525-34. doi: 10.1037/a0019059.
3
Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.颞叶加工中的听觉优势:来自与同步视觉和听觉序列同步的新证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1085-99.
4
Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.重复性敲击和绘画动作中显性和隐性时间的分离。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):575-88. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.575.
5
Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control.敲击和绘图任务之间时间一致性的相关性:反对运动控制单一时间进程的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Oct;25(5):1316-30. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.5.1316.
6
When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Apr;22(2):278-93. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.278.
7
Rhythms and responses.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Apr;11(2):150-67. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.2.150.