Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激联合言语语言治疗对失语症患者自发言语的影响:一项随机对照双盲研究。

Impact of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Speech-language Therapy on Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches 92380, France.

EA4047, HANDIReSP, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Versailles 78180, France.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Jan;26(1):7-18. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aphasia recovery depends on neural reorganization, which can be enhanced by speech-language therapy and noninvasive brain stimulation. Several studies suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with speech-language therapy may improve verbal performance evaluated by analytic tests, but none focused on spontaneous speech. We explored the effect of bihemispheric tDCS on spontaneous speech in patients with poststroke aphasia.

METHODS

In this multicentric controlled randomized cross-over double-blind study, we included 10 patients with poststroke aphasia (4 had aphasia >6 months and 6 with aphasia <6 months). We combined the sessions of speech-language therapy and bihemispheric tDCS (2 mA, 20 min). After three baseline speech evaluations (1/week), two different conditions were randomly consecutively proposed: active and sham tDCS over 3 weeks with 1 week of washout in between. The main outcome measure was the number of different nouns used in 2 min to answer the question "what is your job."

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between conditions concerning the main outcome measure (p = .47) nor in the number of verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, repetitions, blank ideas, ideas, utterances with grammatical errors or paraphasias used. Other cognitive functions (verbal working memory, neglect, or verbal fluency) were not significantly improved in the tDCS group. No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our results differed from previous studies using tDCS to improve naming in patients with poststroke aphasia possibly due to bihemispheric stimulation, rarely used previously. The duration of the rehabilitation period was short given the linguistic complexity of the measure. This negative result should be confirmed by larger studies with ecological measures.

摘要

目的

失语症的恢复依赖于神经重组,这可以通过语言治疗和非侵入性脑刺激来增强。几项研究表明,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合语言治疗可能会提高分析测试评估的言语表现,但都没有关注自发性言语。我们探讨了双半球 tDCS 对脑卒中后失语症患者自发性言语的影响。

方法

在这项多中心对照随机交叉双盲研究中,我们纳入了 10 名脑卒中后失语症患者(4 名失语症时间>6 个月,6 名失语症时间<6 个月)。我们将语言治疗和双半球 tDCS(2 mA,20 分钟)联合治疗。在 3 次基线言语评估(每周 1 次)后,随机连续提出两种不同的条件:3 周的主动和假 tDCS,其间有 1 周的洗脱期。主要观察指标为回答“你的工作是什么”时在 2 分钟内使用的不同名词数量。

结果

在主要观察指标上,两种条件之间没有显著差异(p=0.47),也没有动词、形容词、副词、代词、重复、空白想法、想法、语法错误或错语的数量差异。tDCS 组的其他认知功能(言语工作记忆、忽视或言语流畅性)也没有显著改善。没有不良事件发生。

结论

我们的结果与之前使用 tDCS 改善脑卒中后失语症患者命名的研究结果不同,可能是由于双半球刺激,这在以前很少使用。考虑到测量的语言复杂性,康复期较短。这一阴性结果应通过更大规模的具有生态测量的研究来证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验