Moodie Joanna E, Ritchie Stuart J, Cox Simon R, Harris Mathew A, Muñoz Maniega Susana, Valdés Hernández Maria C, Pattie Alison, Corley Janie, Bastin Mark E, Starr John M, Wardlaw Joanna M, Deary Ian J
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, St Andrews University, St Andrews, UK.
Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Intelligence. 2020 Jan-Feb;78:101407. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101407.
Fluctuating body asymmetry is theorized to indicate developmental instability, and to have small positive associations with low socioeconomic status (SES). Previous studies have reported small negative associations between fluctuating body asymmetry and cognitive functioning, but relationships between fluctuating brain asymmetry and cognitive functioning remain unclear. The present study investigated the association between general intelligence (a latent factor derived from a factor analysis on 13 cognitive tests) and the fluctuating asymmetry of four structural measures of brain hemispheric asymmetry: cortical surface area, cortical volume, cortical thickness, and white matter fractional anisotropy. The sample comprised members of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936, = 636, mean age = 72.9 years). Two methods were used to calculate structural hemispheric asymmetry: in the first method, regions contributed equally to the overall asymmetry score; in the second method, regions contributed proportionally to their size. When regions contributed equally, cortical thickness asymmetry was negatively associated with general intelligence ( = -0.18, < .001). There was no association between cortical thickness asymmetry and childhood SES, suggesting that other mechanisms are involved in the thickness asymmetry-intelligence association. Across all cortical metrics, asymmetry of regions identified by the parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) was not more strongly associated with general intelligence than non-P-FIT asymmetry. When regions contributed proportionally, there were no associations between general intelligence and any of the asymmetry measures. The implications of these findings, and of different methods of calculating structural hemispheric asymmetry, are discussed.
身体波动不对称被认为表明发育不稳定,并与低社会经济地位(SES)存在微弱的正相关。先前的研究报告了身体波动不对称与认知功能之间存在微弱的负相关,但大脑波动不对称与认知功能之间的关系仍不明确。本研究调查了一般智力(从对13项认知测试的因素分析中得出的一个潜在因素)与大脑半球不对称的四个结构测量指标的波动不对称之间的关联:皮质表面积、皮质体积、皮质厚度和白质分数各向异性。样本包括1936年洛锡安出生队列(LBC1936,n = 636,平均年龄 = 72.9岁)的成员。使用了两种方法来计算结构半球不对称性:在第一种方法中,各区域对整体不对称分数的贡献相同;在第二种方法中,各区域根据其大小按比例贡献。当各区域贡献相同时,皮质厚度不对称与一般智力呈负相关(β = -0.18,p <.001)。皮质厚度不对称与儿童期SES之间没有关联,这表明厚度不对称与智力之间的关联涉及其他机制。在所有皮质指标中,由顶叶-额叶整合理论(P-FIT)确定的区域的不对称性与一般智力的关联并不比非P-FIT不对称性更强。当各区域按比例贡献时,一般智力与任何不对称测量指标之间均无关联。讨论了这些发现以及计算结构半球不对称性的不同方法的意义。