Powell Martine B, Burrows Kimberlee S, Brubacher Sonja P, Roberts Kim P
Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Feb 9;24(1):74-89. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1273749. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of this study is to elicit guidance from prosecutors across Australia on questioning children about repeated events. Two focus groups were conducted. The first sought broad feedback concerning questioning children about repeated events. The second focused more specifically on eliciting feedback about techniques for aiding children in describing specific instances of repeated events. The techniques used are derived from a combination of empirical research and best practice interview guidelines. Data from both focus groups were compiled because themes were highly similar. Thematic analysis of the focus group discussions revealed three broad themes in prosecutors' perceptions about questioning children about repeated abuse: a) permitting children to provide a full generic account before describing individual episodes of abuse, b) using the information obtained during the generic account to create episode labels, and c) probing incidences of abuse chronologically. These themes are discussed within the context of the child development and mnemonic literature, and implications for interviewing protocols are drawn.
本研究的目的是征求澳大利亚各地检察官在询问儿童关于重复事件方面的指导意见。开展了两个焦点小组讨论。第一个小组寻求关于询问儿童重复事件的广泛反馈。第二个小组更具体地聚焦于征求有关帮助儿童描述重复事件具体事例的技巧的反馈。所使用的技巧源自实证研究和最佳实践访谈指南的结合。由于两个焦点小组讨论的主题高度相似,因此对两组数据进行了汇总。对焦点小组讨论的主题分析揭示了检察官在询问儿童重复虐待事件方面的看法中的三个广泛主题:a)允许儿童在描述个别虐待事件之前进行全面的一般性陈述,b)利用一般性陈述中获得的信息创建事件标签,c)按时间顺序探究虐待事件。这些主题将在儿童发展和记忆文献的背景下进行讨论,并得出对访谈规程的启示。