• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者诉讼中的前因、行为、法庭案件特征及其对案件结果的影响

Antecedents, Behaviours, and Court Case Characteristics and Their Effects on Case Outcomes in Litigation for Persons with Schizophrenia.

作者信息

LaVan Melissa, LaVan Helen, Martin William M Marty

机构信息

The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Grand Island, NE, USA.

DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 May 16;24(6):866-887. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1316176. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2017.1316176
PMID:31983996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818312/
Abstract

A 10% random sample of 3543 cases litigated in the United States' civil and criminal courts were analysed using logistic regression to develop a model that can predict case outcomes for litigants with schizophrenia. Most predictors are related to case characteristics and not to the litigants' antecedents, behaviours or medication issues. Only the psychologist as an expert witness was found to be related to case outcome, but the concern is expressed that inadequate weight is given to expert testimony. Other significant findings include being represented by counsel, atypical medication and malingering.

摘要

对在美国民事和刑事法庭上进行诉讼的3543个案件的10%随机样本进行了分析,使用逻辑回归来建立一个模型,该模型可以预测精神分裂症诉讼当事人的案件结果。大多数预测因素与案件特征有关,而与诉讼当事人的既往史、行为或药物治疗问题无关。仅发现心理学家作为专家证人与案件结果有关,但有人担心专家证词未得到充分重视。其他重要发现包括由律师代理、非典型药物治疗和诈病。

相似文献

1
Antecedents, Behaviours, and Court Case Characteristics and Their Effects on Case Outcomes in Litigation for Persons with Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者诉讼中的前因、行为、法庭案件特征及其对案件结果的影响
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 May 16;24(6):866-887. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1316176. eCollection 2017.
2
Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.心理学专家证人证言与司法决策趋势。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Dec;42-43:149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Participation of an expert psychologist in the interrogation of a witness in the light of Polish criminal law.参与专家心理学家对证人的审讯,根据波兰刑法。
Psychiatr Pol. 2021 Oct 31;55(5):1169-1181. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/120655.
4
COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Arguments in Polish Civil Litigation.波兰民事诉讼中与新冠疫情相关的争论
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):1215-1232. doi: 10.1007/s11196-021-09875-1. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
[Tips and tricks in court-Practical experience from a medical viewpoint].
Z Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;77(7):587-592. doi: 10.1007/s00393-018-0490-x.
6
Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.神经诉讼:关于扩大达伯特挑战的专家证词要素的观点
NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(2):79-85.
7
From expert witness to defendant: abolition of expert witness protection and its implications.从专家证人到被告:专家证人保护制度的废除及其影响。
J Law Med. 2012 Dec;20(2):250-60.
8
Law & psychiatry: facilitating testimony of people with mental illness.法律与精神病学:促进精神疾病患者的作证。
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Oct;61(10):958-60. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.958.
9
Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.联邦法院中的笔迹证据——从弗莱伊案到锦湖轮胎案
Forensic Sci Rev. 2001 Jul;13(2):87-99.
10
Demonstrating the expertise of an expert witness in the civil court: Use of a concise CV after the judgment in .在民事法庭上展示专家证人的专业知识:判决后使用简洁的简历。
Med Leg J. 2025 Jun;93(2):70-73. doi: 10.1177/00258172231191343. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations with violent and homicidal behaviour among men with schizophrenia.精神分裂症男性患者的暴力和杀人行为相关因素
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(4):303-8. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1109139. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
2
Does Child Abuse and Neglect Increase Risk for Perpetration of Violence Inside and Outside the Home?虐待和忽视儿童会增加在家内外实施暴力行为的风险吗?
Psychol Violence. 2015 Jul 1;5(3):246-255. doi: 10.1037/a0037956.
3
Influence of Criminal Justice Involvement and Psychiatric Diagnoses on Treatment Costs Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness.刑事司法介入和精神疾病诊断对重度精神疾病成年人治疗费用的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Sep;66(9):907-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500134. Epub 2015 May 15.
4
Prevalence of mental health disorders among justice-involved veterans.涉及司法事务的退伍军人中精神健康障碍的患病率。
Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:163-76. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxu003. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
5
Treatment and violent behavior in persons with first episode psychosis during a 10-year prospective follow-up study.在一项为期10年的前瞻性随访研究中,首发精神病患者的治疗与暴力行为
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jul;156(2-3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 15.
6
Criminal behavior and victimization among homeless individuals with severe mental illness: a systematic review. homeless 个体中严重精神疾病患者的犯罪行为和受害:系统综述。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jun 1;65(6):739-50. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200515.
7
Systematic suicide risk assessment for patients with schizophrenia: a national population-based study.精神分裂症患者的系统性自杀风险评估:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):226-31. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200021.
8
A clinical and demographic comparison between a forensic and a general sample of female patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症女性患者法医样本和普通样本的临床和人口统计学比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 30;210(3):1176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
9
Homelessness in a national sample of incarcerated veterans in state and federal prisons.州立和联邦监狱中被监禁退伍军人全国样本中的无家可归情况。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 May;41(3):360-7. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0483-7.
10
Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.审判能力和缺乏自知力的精神病被告。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):85-91.