• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Moral Challenges for Psychologists Working in Psychology and Law.从事心理学与法律工作的心理学家面临的道德挑战。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 14;25(3):485-499. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1473173. eCollection 2018.
2
Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.自由主义、法律道德主义与道德分歧。
J Appl Philos. 2005;22(2):185-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00302.x.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
5
The ethics of profession in dental medicine.牙医学中的职业道德。
Health Matrix. 1984 Summer;2(2):3-15.
6
On being a certifying abortion consultant: an ethical dilemma.
N Z Med J. 1980 May 14;91(659):346-7.
7
Introduction引言
8
How Reasons Make Law.理由如何创制法律。
Oxf J Leg Stud. 2023 Dec 13;44(1):133-155. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqad026. eCollection 2024 Spring.
9
Social Responsibility and the State's Duty to provide Healthcare: An Islamic Ethico-Legal Perspective.社会责任与国家提供医疗保健的义务:伊斯兰伦理法律视角。
Dev World Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(3):205-214. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12140. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts.对罗夏墨迹测验在欧洲法庭应用的批判性综述。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 26;29(2):183-205. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1894260. eCollection 2022.
2
Structuring the debate about research ethics in the psychology and law field: an international perspective.构建心理学与法律领域研究伦理的辩论:国际视角
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Apr 21;27(3):397-411. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742243. eCollection 2020.
3
Assessing the Risk of Australian Indigenous Sexual Offenders Reoffending: A Review of the Research Literature and Court Decisions.评估澳大利亚原住民性犯罪者再次犯罪的风险:研究文献与法庭判决综述
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Oct 31;26(2):274-294. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation.无群体选择的群体合作:适度惩罚可促成更多合作。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124561. eCollection 2015.
2
Throwing Away the Key: The Ethics of Risk Assessment for Preventive Detention Schemes: R.G. Myers Memorial Lecture 2013.扔掉钥匙:预防性拘留计划风险评估的伦理:2013年R.G.迈尔斯纪念讲座
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2014 Sep 3;21(5):779-790. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.893551.
3
Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: an FMRI study.接受道歉和主动原谅的神经关联:一项 fMRI 研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087654. eCollection 2014.
4
Unconscious influences on decision making: a critical review.无意识对决策的影响:批判性回顾。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Feb;37(1):1-19. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12003214. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
5
Short-term predictive validity of the static-99 and static-99-R for indigenous and nonindigenous Australian sexual offenders.静态-99 和静态-99-R 对澳大利亚本土和非本土性犯罪者的短期预测有效性。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Jun;25(3):302-16. doi: 10.1177/1079063212472937. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
6
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.复仇和宽恕的认知系统。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
The neuroscience of social decision-making.社会决策的神经科学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647.
8
Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice.青少年司法的医源性效应。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;50(8):991-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x.
9
Invariants of human behavior.人类行为的不变量。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:1-19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245.
10
Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience.社会决策:来自博弈论和神经科学的见解
Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):598-602. doi: 10.1126/science.1142996.

从事心理学与法律工作的心理学家面临的道德挑战。

Moral Challenges for Psychologists Working in Psychology and Law.

作者信息

Allan Alfred

机构信息

School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 14;25(3):485-499. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1473173. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2018.1473173
PMID:31984034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818288/
Abstract

States have an obligation to protect themselves and their citizens from harm, and they use the coercive powers of law to investigate threats, enforce rules and arbitrate disputes, thereby impacting on people's well-being and legal rights and privileges. Psychologists as a collective have a responsibility to use their abilities, knowledge, skill and experience to enhance law's effectiveness, efficiency, and reliability in preventing harm, but their professional behaviour in this collaboration must be moral. They could, however, find their personal values to be inappropriate or there to be insufficient moral guides and could find it difficult to obtain definitive moral guidance from law. The profession's ethical principles do, however, provide well-articulated, generally accepted and profession-appropriate guidance, but practitioners might encounter moral issues that can only be solved by the profession as a whole or society.

摘要

各国都有义务保护自己及其公民免受伤害,它们运用法律的强制力来调查威胁、执行规则和仲裁争端,从而影响人们的福祉以及法律权利和特权。作为一个群体,心理学家有责任运用他们的能力、知识、技能和经验来提高法律在预防伤害方面的有效性、效率和可靠性,但他们在这种合作中的专业行为必须合乎道德。然而,他们可能会发现自己的个人价值观不合适,或者缺乏足够的道德指引,并且可能难以从法律中获得明确的道德指导。不过,该行业的伦理原则确实提供了明确阐述、普遍接受且适合该行业的指导,但从业者可能会遇到只能由整个行业或社会来解决的道德问题。