Allan Alfred, Parry Catherine L, Ferrante Anna, Gillies Christine, Griffiths Catherine S, Morgan Francis, Spiranovic Caroline, Smallbone Stephen, Tubex Hilde, Wong Stephen C P
School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
PHRN Centre for Data Linkage, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Oct 31;26(2):274-294. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242. eCollection 2019.
The assessment of offenders' risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is a core activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments is to reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become more contentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in an ethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose the limitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makers and understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts in respect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders' risk of reoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for the assessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit and give weight to practitioners' evidence and opinions based on data obtained with non-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables with enough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be used to assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validity of the instruments that practitioners use.
评估罪犯再次犯罪的风险,尤其是性犯罪再犯风险,是法医精神健康从业者的核心工作。这些评估的目的是降低对公众造成伤害的风险,但它们存在争议,而当澳大利亚的从业者希望以符合道德责任的方式进行此类评估时,争议就变得更大了,因为他们必须使用经过可靠验证的工具,向司法决策者披露其评估方法、工具和数据的局限性,并了解决策者可能如何使用他们的报告。这项系统的文献综述的目的是探讨澳大利亚从业者和法院在评估澳大利亚土著男性性犯罪者再犯风险方面的做法。我们未能找到专门为评估这一人群而开发的工具。澳大利亚各法院在是否承认并重视从业者基于未经验证的工具所获数据得出的证据和意见方面存在差异。我们只能确定三个可能的预测变量,它们有足够的定量支持,足以证明可将其纳入用于评估土著性犯罪者的工具中。有必要对从业者使用的工具的有效性进行研究。