Adams-Quackenbush Nicole M, Horselenberg Robert, Hubert Josephine, Vrij Aldert, van Koppen Peter
Department of Criminal Law & Criminology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2019 Jan 22;26(1):150-166. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522. eCollection 2019.
Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.
预期效应已知会影响行为,使预期的事情似乎成为现实。在本研究中,通过(编造的)关于诚实和特定群体成员身份的信息来诱导预期。在非指控性的访谈环境中,使用中性和收集信息的问题对目标对象进行测试。研究假设,那些接触到负面信息(预期)的人会表现出与认知负荷增加相一致的行为,并且发现有证据支持这一预测。由于收集信息问题的调查性质,还预期接触到预期的目标对象在访谈的调查部分会表现出更多此类行为。发现一些行为支持这一预测(即回答更简短和言语干扰增加);然而,在访谈的这一阶段未观察到表现改变负荷的指标。这些发现支持了预期效应会显著改变受访者行为这一假设。