Vrij Aldert, Leal Sharon, Mann Samantha, Vernham Zarah, Dalton Gary, Serok-Jeppa Or, Rozmann Nir, Nahari Galit, Fisher Ronald P
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Institute of Criminal Justice, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Sep 11;28(4):546-559. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805812. eCollection 2021.
We examined how much information British and Arab truth tellers and lie tellers volunteer in an initial free narrative. Based on cultural differences in communication styles we predicted that British interviewees would report more details and more complications than Arab interviewees (culture main effect). We further predicted that truth tellers would report more details and complications than lie tellers (veracity main effect), particularly in the British sample (Veracity × Culture interaction effect). A total of 78 British and 76 Israeli-Arab participants took part. The experiment was carried out at a British university and an Israeli university. Participants carried out a mission. Truth tellers were instructed to report the mission truthfully in a subsequent interview whereas lie tellers were asked to lie about certain aspects of the mission. The three hypotheses were supported for details, whereas for complications only the predicted veracity main effect occurred.
我们研究了英国和阿拉伯的真话讲述者及说谎者在初始自由叙述中会主动提供多少信息。基于沟通方式的文化差异,我们预测英国受访者会比阿拉伯受访者报告更多细节和更多复杂情况(文化主效应)。我们进一步预测,真话讲述者会比说谎者报告更多细节和复杂情况(真实性主效应),特别是在英国样本中(真实性×文化交互效应)。共有78名英国参与者和76名以色列阿拉伯参与者参与。实验在一所英国大学和一所以色列大学进行。参与者执行了一项任务。真话讲述者被指示在随后的访谈中如实报告任务,而说谎者则被要求对任务的某些方面进行说谎。关于细节,这三个假设得到了支持,而关于复杂情况,只出现了预测的真实性主效应。